04-25-2004, 10:36 PM
Subject: NEHRU DYNASTY
Author: "Kris Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Internet
Date: 2/8/03 8:15 AM
I RECEIVED THIS FROM A FRIEND.......
______________________________________________________________________
I don't know who wrote this piece & I have no idea who started or what is
the purpose of this propaganda. I am forwarding this because I believe that
in this modern age of information, to be concerned responsible citizens one
should be well informed - from all angles - before we can make truly
informed choices that may effect our own lives - & the society. It would
even be interesting to know why this kind of stuff is being circulated now.
Most of the information here is old news, but a lot of it did surprise me. I
have no way of authenticating any of it and do not vouch for its truth. In
fact I do not even approve of the style of the writing - very condescending,
presumptuous & slanderous. But interesting reading !
At the very beginning of his book, THE NEHRU DYNASTY, astrologer K.N.Rao
mentions the names of Jawaharlal's father and grandfather.
Jawaharlal's father was believed to be Motilal and Motilal's father was one
Gangadhar Nehru. And we all know that Jawaharlal's only daughter was Indira
Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of
tuberculosis. She was totally against Indira's proposed marriage with
Feroze. Why? No one tells us that. Now, who is this Feroze? We are told by
many that he was the son of the family grocer. The grocer supplied
wines,etc. to Anand Bhavan, previously known as Ishrat Manzil, which once
belonged to a Moslem lawyer named Mobarak Ali. Motilal was earlier an
employee of Mobarak Ali. What was the family grocer's name? One frequently
hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru. But then we all
know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal
grandfathers. In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more
important grandfather in most societies. Why is it then no where we find
Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather's name? It appears that the reason is
simply this. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather was a Moslem gentleman from
the Junagadh area of Gujarat. This Moslem grocer by the name of Nawab Khan,
had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This is the source
where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Rajiv's father
Feroze was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru's
wishes. Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated with
Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with
Indira, by an affidavit.
The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings)
Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by
Gurudev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was all by
herself, while father Jawaharlal was busy with politics, pretty women and
illicit sex; the mother was in hospital. Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was
then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she
changed her religion, became a Moslem woman and married Feroze Khan in a
London mosque.
Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this
marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gandhi urgently
called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young-man to change his
name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from
Islam to Hinduism for instance. It was just a case of a change of name by an
affidavit. And! so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi. The surprising thing is
that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India's Mahatma
and the 'father of the nation' didn't mention this game of his in the famous
> book, 'My Experiments with Truth'. Why?
When they returned to India, a mock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for public
consumption. On this subject, writes M.O. Mathai (a long time Private Secretary
of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI) Reminiscences of the
Nehru Age on page 94, second paragraph: "For some inexplicable reason, Nehru
allowed the marriage to be performed according to
Vedic rites in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage under
Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a
civil marriage."
It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and Feroze lived
separately, but they were not divorced. Feroze used to harass Nehru
frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's political activities.
Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime
Minister's residence Trimurthi Bhavan. Mathai writes that the death of
Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960
before he could consolidate his own political forces, is itself a mystery.
Feroze had even planned to remarry.
Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions
and deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of
Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan)known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of
Feroze. He was the son of another Moslem gentleman, Mohammad Yunus. Here, in
passing, we might mention that the second son was originally named > Sanjiv.
It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's name. It was changed to Sanjay
when he was arrested by the British police in England and his passport
impounded, for having stolen a car. Krishna Menon was then India's High
Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon
who changed his name to Sanjay. Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the
Sikh girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name
of Lord Indra's court dancer rather offensive!) took place quite
surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus' house in New Delhi. And the marriage with
Menaka who was a model (She had model for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a
towel) was not so ordinary either. Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed
young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered pregnant by Sanjay. It was
then that her father, Colonel Anand,threatened Sanjay with dire consequences
if he did not marry his daughter. And that did the trick. Sanjay married
Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was
unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka; apparently he had wanted to
get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who
cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane accident. In Yunus' book,
'Persons,Passions & Politics' one discovers that baby Sanjay had been
circumcised following Islamic custom, although the reason stated was
phimosis. It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi
and due to this she usd to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to
run the country as though it were his personal fiefdom. Was he black mailing
her with the secret of who his real father was? When the news of Sanjay's
death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was about
the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him.
Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards. At least one case is very
graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his "Reminiscences of the Nehru
Age", page 206. Mathai writes: "In the autumn of 1948 (India became free in
1947 and a great deal of work needed to be done) a young woman from Banaras
arrived in New Delhi as a Sanyasini named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not
a real name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian
scriptures and mythology. People, including MPs, thronged to her to hear her
discourses. One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought a letter
in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM's house.
As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young,
shapely and beautiful. Meetings with her became rather frequent, mostly
after Nehru finished his work at night. During one of Nehru's visits to
Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there, and Upadhyaya brought a letter from
her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply; and she visited Nehru at midnight
.... "Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared. In November 1949 a convent in
Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He
said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few
months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or
give any particulars about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was
well enough to move out but left the child behind.
She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among
other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother Superior, who
was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was told they were from the
Prime Minister. The person who brought the letters surrendered them..."I
(Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get
a clue about his whereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely
tight-lipped and secretive. Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would
have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully
ignorant of who his father was."
Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so called
Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy.
Rajiv became Roberto. His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul.
Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as
Priyanka and Rahul. What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance
in such matters. The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after
taking over as prime minister of India was very informative. In this press
conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi. Mind you,
peaking of the Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all. His
grandmother father's motherhad turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi
religion to marry Nawab Khan.
It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of
Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington
Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children's encyclopaedias
recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered
University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in
the world today! The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at
that University Rajiv had not passed a single examination. He had therefore
to leave Cambridge without a certificate. Sonia too had the same benevolent
treatment. She was stated to be a student in Cambridge. Such a description
is calculated to mislead Indians. She was a student in Cambridge all right
but not of the University of Cambridge but of one of those fly by night
language schools where foreign students come to learn English. Sonia was
working as an 'au pair' girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the
same time. And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic
rites in full view of India's public.
This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now an Italian leads a
prestigious national party because of just one qualification - being married
into the Nehru family. Maneka Gandhi itself is being accepted by the non
Congress parties not because she was a former model or an animal lover, but
for her links to the Nehru family. Saying that an Italian should not lead
India will amount to narrow mindness, but if Sania Maino (Sonia)had served
India like say Mother Teresa or Annie Besant, i.e. in anyway on her own
rights, then all Indians should be proud of her just as how proud we are of
Mother Teresa.
Author: "Kris Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Internet
Date: 2/8/03 8:15 AM
I RECEIVED THIS FROM A FRIEND.......
______________________________________________________________________
I don't know who wrote this piece & I have no idea who started or what is
the purpose of this propaganda. I am forwarding this because I believe that
in this modern age of information, to be concerned responsible citizens one
should be well informed - from all angles - before we can make truly
informed choices that may effect our own lives - & the society. It would
even be interesting to know why this kind of stuff is being circulated now.
Most of the information here is old news, but a lot of it did surprise me. I
have no way of authenticating any of it and do not vouch for its truth. In
fact I do not even approve of the style of the writing - very condescending,
presumptuous & slanderous. But interesting reading !
At the very beginning of his book, THE NEHRU DYNASTY, astrologer K.N.Rao
mentions the names of Jawaharlal's father and grandfather.
Jawaharlal's father was believed to be Motilal and Motilal's father was one
Gangadhar Nehru. And we all know that Jawaharlal's only daughter was Indira
Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of
tuberculosis. She was totally against Indira's proposed marriage with
Feroze. Why? No one tells us that. Now, who is this Feroze? We are told by
many that he was the son of the family grocer. The grocer supplied
wines,etc. to Anand Bhavan, previously known as Ishrat Manzil, which once
belonged to a Moslem lawyer named Mobarak Ali. Motilal was earlier an
employee of Mobarak Ali. What was the family grocer's name? One frequently
hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru. But then we all
know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal
grandfathers. In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more
important grandfather in most societies. Why is it then no where we find
Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather's name? It appears that the reason is
simply this. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather was a Moslem gentleman from
the Junagadh area of Gujarat. This Moslem grocer by the name of Nawab Khan,
had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This is the source
where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Rajiv's father
Feroze was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru's
wishes. Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated with
Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with
Indira, by an affidavit.
The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings)
Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by
Gurudev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was all by
herself, while father Jawaharlal was busy with politics, pretty women and
illicit sex; the mother was in hospital. Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was
then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she
changed her religion, became a Moslem woman and married Feroze Khan in a
London mosque.
Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this
marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gandhi urgently
called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young-man to change his
name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from
Islam to Hinduism for instance. It was just a case of a change of name by an
affidavit. And! so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi. The surprising thing is
that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India's Mahatma
and the 'father of the nation' didn't mention this game of his in the famous
> book, 'My Experiments with Truth'. Why?
When they returned to India, a mock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for public
consumption. On this subject, writes M.O. Mathai (a long time Private Secretary
of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI) Reminiscences of the
Nehru Age on page 94, second paragraph: "For some inexplicable reason, Nehru
allowed the marriage to be performed according to
Vedic rites in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage under
Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a
civil marriage."
It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and Feroze lived
separately, but they were not divorced. Feroze used to harass Nehru
frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's political activities.
Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime
Minister's residence Trimurthi Bhavan. Mathai writes that the death of
Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960
before he could consolidate his own political forces, is itself a mystery.
Feroze had even planned to remarry.
Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions
and deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of
Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan)known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of
Feroze. He was the son of another Moslem gentleman, Mohammad Yunus. Here, in
passing, we might mention that the second son was originally named > Sanjiv.
It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's name. It was changed to Sanjay
when he was arrested by the British police in England and his passport
impounded, for having stolen a car. Krishna Menon was then India's High
Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon
who changed his name to Sanjay. Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the
Sikh girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name
of Lord Indra's court dancer rather offensive!) took place quite
surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus' house in New Delhi. And the marriage with
Menaka who was a model (She had model for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a
towel) was not so ordinary either. Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed
young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered pregnant by Sanjay. It was
then that her father, Colonel Anand,threatened Sanjay with dire consequences
if he did not marry his daughter. And that did the trick. Sanjay married
Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was
unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka; apparently he had wanted to
get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who
cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane accident. In Yunus' book,
'Persons,Passions & Politics' one discovers that baby Sanjay had been
circumcised following Islamic custom, although the reason stated was
phimosis. It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi
and due to this she usd to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to
run the country as though it were his personal fiefdom. Was he black mailing
her with the secret of who his real father was? When the news of Sanjay's
death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was about
the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him.
Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards. At least one case is very
graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his "Reminiscences of the Nehru
Age", page 206. Mathai writes: "In the autumn of 1948 (India became free in
1947 and a great deal of work needed to be done) a young woman from Banaras
arrived in New Delhi as a Sanyasini named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not
a real name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian
scriptures and mythology. People, including MPs, thronged to her to hear her
discourses. One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought a letter
in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM's house.
As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young,
shapely and beautiful. Meetings with her became rather frequent, mostly
after Nehru finished his work at night. During one of Nehru's visits to
Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there, and Upadhyaya brought a letter from
her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply; and she visited Nehru at midnight
.... "Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared. In November 1949 a convent in
Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He
said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few
months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or
give any particulars about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was
well enough to move out but left the child behind.
She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among
other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother Superior, who
was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was told they were from the
Prime Minister. The person who brought the letters surrendered them..."I
(Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get
a clue about his whereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely
tight-lipped and secretive. Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would
have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully
ignorant of who his father was."
Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so called
Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy.
Rajiv became Roberto. His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul.
Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as
Priyanka and Rahul. What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance
in such matters. The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after
taking over as prime minister of India was very informative. In this press
conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi. Mind you,
peaking of the Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all. His
grandmother father's motherhad turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi
religion to marry Nawab Khan.
It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of
Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington
Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children's encyclopaedias
recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered
University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in
the world today! The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at
that University Rajiv had not passed a single examination. He had therefore
to leave Cambridge without a certificate. Sonia too had the same benevolent
treatment. She was stated to be a student in Cambridge. Such a description
is calculated to mislead Indians. She was a student in Cambridge all right
but not of the University of Cambridge but of one of those fly by night
language schools where foreign students come to learn English. Sonia was
working as an 'au pair' girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the
same time. And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic
rites in full view of India's public.
This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now an Italian leads a
prestigious national party because of just one qualification - being married
into the Nehru family. Maneka Gandhi itself is being accepted by the non
Congress parties not because she was a former model or an animal lover, but
for her links to the Nehru family. Saying that an Italian should not lead
India will amount to narrow mindness, but if Sania Maino (Sonia)had served
India like say Mother Teresa or Annie Besant, i.e. in anyway on her own
rights, then all Indians should be proud of her just as how proud we are of
Mother Teresa.