<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->There has been a EU proposal to ban the Swastika and Hindus are opposing it, link is:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,15...59,00.html
There is an interesting discussion about it going on at ff:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewto...423bae2821
I hope the same standards are applied to the cross, if swastika is banned it would be fair to say that the cross can be banned totally in both US and India because it was used in the Goan Inquisition and also by the KKK in the US to terrorise black people.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Whatever happens, they should definitely ban the cross as suggested, as well as images of jesus and the name of Jesus (Christ) in all the world. Since "In the name of Jesus/Christ" was used to terrorise and genocide everyone from the Old Europeans to native Americans to Africans to people in Asia, in order to make them convert.
Difference between the Indian situation and the cross is as follows:
- nazis used a symbol, the hakenkreuz (which has nothing to do with the Hindu Swasthika), to genocide people
- christians used their own religious symbol (the cross) to genocide people
EU should punish the christos for using their symbol for evil purposes which has made their symbol evil. But Hindus did not use Hindu symbol for anything evil, so our symbol is still free from all taint and we should not be punished. Punish the neo nazis still using hakenkreuz - they live in America and Europe.
(The Dionysus-on-a-cross worshippers can return when christoislamism is finally dead.)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,15...59,00.html
There is an interesting discussion about it going on at ff:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewto...423bae2821
I hope the same standards are applied to the cross, if swastika is banned it would be fair to say that the cross can be banned totally in both US and India because it was used in the Goan Inquisition and also by the KKK in the US to terrorise black people.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Whatever happens, they should definitely ban the cross as suggested, as well as images of jesus and the name of Jesus (Christ) in all the world. Since "In the name of Jesus/Christ" was used to terrorise and genocide everyone from the Old Europeans to native Americans to Africans to people in Asia, in order to make them convert.
Difference between the Indian situation and the cross is as follows:
- nazis used a symbol, the hakenkreuz (which has nothing to do with the Hindu Swasthika), to genocide people
- christians used their own religious symbol (the cross) to genocide people
EU should punish the christos for using their symbol for evil purposes which has made their symbol evil. But Hindus did not use Hindu symbol for anything evil, so our symbol is still free from all taint and we should not be punished. Punish the neo nazis still using hakenkreuz - they live in America and Europe.
(The Dionysus-on-a-cross worshippers can return when christoislamism is finally dead.)