I had written up most of my answer to you last time I logged in, having already looked through both my DVD cupboards as well as going through my wishlist of further DVDs to purchase and of programs I'm keeping an eye out for for if they release it as well as of descriptions of half-remembered programs we* watched in childhood whose titles we never knew or have forgotten. [* Where "we" refers to sister and myself.]
But I haven't posted all that yet. Because.
[color="#0000FF"]I'll answer your questions, if you'll answer mine.
Which of HH or Bodhi authors that vajrin blog?[/color] (Didn't see that one coming did ya?)
The third person who sounds somewhat like HH got eliminated owing to a few features of the blog. And I don't think there's any extra persons I need to consider: there's certain terminology used that limits the options to just HH and Bodhi. Well, unless HH has another blogger friend/acquaintance who has adopted all his terminology/his style of invention of terminology.)
It's really bugging me now because there are features that are very Bodhi [and unlike HH] and yet there's also suggestions made that I'd have bet money were more HH than Bodhi. I myself suspect it's a certain one of the two (but am obviously not sure/am left with questions that don't add up, else I wouldn't be asking), but don't want to influence your answer in case point 3 below applies. I really want to know if I'm right. I may not be great at guessing which signature belongs to which handwriting, but I hate being stumped on the question of who wrote something, when just a little data should allow one to make up one's mind.
[color="#0000FF"]Now, it may be that: 1. the blogger's identity is a secret; 2. it's not your secret to tell; 3. you don't yourself actually know, but haven't (or have) thought about it; 4. none of 1-3 (i.e. you know the answer and it's not particularly private) but you don't want to answer the question for whatever reason.[/color]
If it's 1 or 2, that's okay, I respect keeping secrets. And will answer your questions anyway.
If it's 4, I'm just going to have to withhold my answers too. Not that they're a matter of life and death.
[color="#0000FF"]If it's 3,[/color] then I want you to guess which of the two persons it is - preferrably without visiting the blog again, because recollection's a good exercise for your brain - based on any indicative points/features you remember ever reading on the pages of that blog (even if you only ever read one page) combined with what you know of the two persons. In your answer, you will need to list the points for your argument in favour of who it is. Even if you have not reasonably convinced yourself which of the two it is, your reasoning for each person is still valuable. (You may come up with things that I didn't think of and which may help me to decisively finalise on one or the other person.)
In your answer, state which of 1 to 4 it is. If you cheat and say it's 1 or 2 when it's not - to get off easy (say because you don't want to bother writing up your reasoning for 3) - then that's just unfair.
[color="#0000FF"]BE AWARE[/color] though, that there is no real reward: my answers to your questions may be totally useless - as they usually tend to be. Or one of them may be accidentally useful for a change (hey, it could happen). It's a gamble, but one which it's up to you whether you take it or not.
But I haven't posted all that yet. Because.
[color="#0000FF"]I'll answer your questions, if you'll answer mine.
Which of HH or Bodhi authors that vajrin blog?[/color] (Didn't see that one coming did ya?)
The third person who sounds somewhat like HH got eliminated owing to a few features of the blog. And I don't think there's any extra persons I need to consider: there's certain terminology used that limits the options to just HH and Bodhi. Well, unless HH has another blogger friend/acquaintance who has adopted all his terminology/his style of invention of terminology.)
It's really bugging me now because there are features that are very Bodhi [and unlike HH] and yet there's also suggestions made that I'd have bet money were more HH than Bodhi. I myself suspect it's a certain one of the two (but am obviously not sure/am left with questions that don't add up, else I wouldn't be asking), but don't want to influence your answer in case point 3 below applies. I really want to know if I'm right. I may not be great at guessing which signature belongs to which handwriting, but I hate being stumped on the question of who wrote something, when just a little data should allow one to make up one's mind.
[color="#0000FF"]Now, it may be that: 1. the blogger's identity is a secret; 2. it's not your secret to tell; 3. you don't yourself actually know, but haven't (or have) thought about it; 4. none of 1-3 (i.e. you know the answer and it's not particularly private) but you don't want to answer the question for whatever reason.[/color]
If it's 1 or 2, that's okay, I respect keeping secrets. And will answer your questions anyway.
If it's 4, I'm just going to have to withhold my answers too. Not that they're a matter of life and death.
[color="#0000FF"]If it's 3,[/color] then I want you to guess which of the two persons it is - preferrably without visiting the blog again, because recollection's a good exercise for your brain - based on any indicative points/features you remember ever reading on the pages of that blog (even if you only ever read one page) combined with what you know of the two persons. In your answer, you will need to list the points for your argument in favour of who it is. Even if you have not reasonably convinced yourself which of the two it is, your reasoning for each person is still valuable. (You may come up with things that I didn't think of and which may help me to decisively finalise on one or the other person.)
In your answer, state which of 1 to 4 it is. If you cheat and say it's 1 or 2 when it's not - to get off easy (say because you don't want to bother writing up your reasoning for 3) - then that's just unfair.
[color="#0000FF"]BE AWARE[/color] though, that there is no real reward: my answers to your questions may be totally useless - as they usually tend to be. Or one of them may be accidentally useful for a change (hey, it could happen). It's a gamble, but one which it's up to you whether you take it or not.