Traitors And Anti-nationals In India!

[Guest]

<!--QuoteBegin-Mudy+Jul 1 2006, 08:26 PM-->QUOTE(Mudy @ Jul 1 2006, 08:26 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->xpost
<b>Another Rabindra Singh??</b>

See this NSC Secretariat employee arrested

How many more??
[right][snapback]53072[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Excerpts from above article:
<i>They are also investigating why the woman was interested in India's national security matters when both the United States and India are in the process of forging a strong partnership.</i>

I would like to know the result of this top class investigation. <!--emo&--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif' /><!--endemo-->

[Guest]

<!--QuoteBegin-utepian+Nov 17 2006, 03:32 AM-->QUOTE(utepian @ Nov 17 2006, 03:32 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Things the ELM will not report. Enjoy!  <!--emo&:bcow--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/b_cowboy.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='b_cowboy.gif' /><!--endemo-->

<img src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/6098/3568/1600/sandeep%20pandey.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/6098/3...ep%20pandey.jpg
[right][snapback]60897[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Sandeep Pandey is an insult to everyone with a last name of Pandey, especially to following people:
Sri Mangal Pandey (Revolutionary from 1857)
Lt. Manoj Pandey (PVC from Kargil)

[Guest]

<!--QuoteBegin-ben_ami+Mar 31 2007, 10:36 PM-->QUOTE(ben_ami @ Mar 31 2007, 10:36 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurmit_Singh_Aulakh
[right][snapback]66396[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

This Gurmit fellow is not an honest fellow.

Here is why:

1) India's Prime Minister is a Sikh
2) India's chief of army is a Sikh
3) Punjab receives highest amount of subsidy from Central Govt after Kashmir
(Some of that money will be better spent in places like UP, Orissa, Assam and so on.)

[Guest]

<!--QuoteBegin-Kumar+Apr 1 2007, 08:54 PM-->QUOTE(Kumar @ Apr 1 2007, 08:54 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-ben_ami+Mar 31 2007, 10:36 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ben_ami @ Mar 31 2007, 10:36 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurmit_Singh_Aulakh
[right][snapback]66396[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

3) Punjab receives highest amount of subsidy from Central Govt after Kashmir

[right][snapback]66429[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


i want to know.... why is punjab given this preference??? no wonder punjab has better infrastructure than the rest of the country... afterall a hefty part of the money collected from the whole of india has been sunk into punjab since independence. but why?

[Guest]

Punjab is a border state. Before fence it was very important to discourage people to get involved in anti social or anti-national activity sponsored by Pakistan. Sikh movement was end product of such adventure. Prosperity in Punjab is very important, initially to keep people loyal towards India. It worked also. Investing in Punjab was a good investment, first punjab’s fertile land and hardworking people, and result was great.

One should remember after partion maximum fertile land went to Pakistan. Refugess from pakistan need every support.

In 70s, before DD or AIR started separate station for Punjab, Pakistan was beaming their propaganda through TV and radio in Punjab. There was a time when we were only able to see Pakistani programme and one can easily see propaganda. They will show prosperity everywhere in Pakistan and all negative news about India. They were very good in brainwashing, e.g. we all are brothers, language ties us, our culture is same, we are separated brothers etc. Then they gave us Sikh movement, drugs and liquor culture. Because of prosperity, now people have no interest in Pakistan for jobs or other reason. Yes, drugs may be.

[Guest]

Good riddens.

<b>Khalistan in 2007? - Chauhan's 'dream' dies with him</b><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The Khalistan ideologue's 'intuition' - that the separate Sikh nation would become a reality in 2007 - died with him Wednesday morning when the once fiery separatist passed away in a Punjab town following a heart attack.

The 78-year-old Sikh leader spent nearly half his life propagating a separate Sikh state - Khalistan (land of the pure) - after he first inserted an advertisement in the New York Times in Oct 1971 conceptualising an idea.
...........
'About 5-10 percent Sikhs supported the demand for Khalistan at one stage in the mid-1980s. After 1990, no one has really bothered about it. Now, I don't think anyone has the time or the inclination to even give it a thought,' said retired professor Balbir Singh.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->