Post 2/2
This post is actually related/spins off from
the above post, although the above
contains news from today.
The following 3 articles are by Paul Belien from 2007/2008. One of them is at BrusselsJournal, which he writes for, though the piece was
originally written for the "Washington Times" - IIRC a US newspaper owned by the Korean very-christian megalomaniac Reverend Moon (whose influence is quite ubiquitous). The "BrusselsJournal" itself is a very Right "conservative" christian European paper stationed in I think Switzerland and aimed at Europe: not just at Brussels or even Belgium in particular, despite its name. Note that Paul Belien is also associated with the "Hudson institute" or something, which sounds like America recognises not just him but also the BrusselsJournal which he is well-known to additionally write for.
The aim of most Right conservative christian European outlets is mainly "Europe for Europeans" (but based in a 'judeo-christian' society, i.e. not their heathenisms). Their primary enemy is islam, although they are in truth against all immigration and some of their readers are plain vanilla white supremacists. The BrusselsJournal does not appear to have quite such extreme right entities *writing* for it (they are against multiculturalism and continued immigration, and suspicious of non-western immigrants), but its readers do cover the whole range.
(I actually agree with "Europe is for Europeans", but that's not only because I think every heathen nation belongs to its ethnic *heathen* inhabitants - i.e. specifically India is not for christoislamics, I don't care if the converts are "genetically Indian" and their "ancestry was Hindu" - but also because I think the Americas are for its natives, not the settlers. That last is only fair. Yes, "Europe for Europeans" - I agree and
with actual sympathy - but only on the aforementioned terms, so that *all* may have an ancestral homeland where they will be left alone. I think human societies even as at anno 2000s are simply not psychologically ready for the mass changes that ethnic mish-mashing and assimilation portend. It's not fair to the natives of *any* part of the world, including the natives of Europe. No people - no matter how "liberal" - is actually ready for this, not counting individuals who have happily intermarried (even that is a strain on host societies because it inevitably breeds divided loyalties). It's possible that in the space age none of this will matter any more - as some optimistic sci-fi always assumes - but in any case, we're not in that future yet.
4.
www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2739
Quote:The French and Their Gun Laws
From the desk of Paul Belien on Wed, 2007-12-05 09:55
On Sunday evening Nov. 25 in Villiers-le-Bel, an immigrant suburb to the north of Paris, two youths steal a motorbike and go joyriding. They collide at high speed with a police vehicle that just happens to be passing by. The two youths die on the spot. Villiers-le-Bel is one of France's 751 "zones urbaines sensibles" (sensitive urban areas). These are no-go zones where radical Muslims hold sway. Almost 5 million people, or 8 percent of the French population, live in such zones. In May, Nicolas Sarkozy won the French presidential elections with the promise that he was going to reclaim them for the republic.
So far the "lost territories" have not been reclaimed. Following the death of the two boys, youths went on the rampage in Villiers-le-Bel. They blamed the two policemen in the vehicle for "murdering" the boys "because the police should not have been there." During three nights of rioting, several police stations, schools and shops were burned to the ground. When the authorities sent in the police, almost 200 policemen got injured ââ¬â many of them by guns.
"We were attacked from all sides by youths armed with hunting rifles," one of the officers said. "The kids were shooting at us. I've never seen anything like it. It was like in a movie."
Meanwhile, a horror movie was taking place just around the corner. On that same Sunday evening, 43-year-old Thierry Deve-Oglou, a Frenchman of Turkish origin, went to the metro station near Villiers-le-Bel, the very area where the rioting was going on. He boarded the RER D, the metro line connecting Paris to its northern suburbs. Mr. Deve-Oglou took the train in the northern direction, away from Paris.
The suburban metro is generally considered unsafe, and the D line is one of the most dangerous, especially beyond Garges, the station after Villiers-le-Bel. "There are no guards and no surveillance cameras," a metro employee acknowledges. "After Garges there are hardly any passengers left on the train. It is then that the acts of aggression begin."
Mr. Deve-Oglou noticed that the metro carriage was empty except for a young blond woman whom he there and then decided to rape. He had done this before, in January 1995, on the same RER D line, in the same place. Then, however, his victim had not dared to resist. She survived the attack and was able to testify at his trial the following year when he was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison.
This time, however, the victim fought back. Anne-Lorraine Schmitt, a 23-year-old journalism student and the eldest of five children from a Catholic and patriotic family ââ¬â her father, Philippe, is an army colonel ââ¬â tried to escape. Mr. Deve-Oglou stabbed her. She managed to hurt him with his own knife, but he butchered her with more than 30 stab wounds in the chest and face.
[photo caption:] Anne-Lorraine Schmitt
Mr. Deve-Oglou left the train carriage at the next metro station, but police officers noticed the bleeding man and took him to the hospital. When half an hour later Anne-Lorraine's body was discovered in the empty carriage at the RER D terminus in Creil, it was not difficult to find the killer. He was arrested the same evening. Soon the police was able to solve similar rapes on the same line D during the previous years.
Why had the police never questioned this serial rapist before? Why had he been released after his first conviction? The question haunts Philippe Schmitt. "The circumstances of Anne-Lorraine's death are devastating to us," he writes. "We do not dare to imagine the 'horror movie' that took place inside that closed car of the RER, line D. Why was such an individual, already convicted of sexual assaults, able to repeat his crime? In 5, 10, 15 years, everyone knows he will be free again."
Frederic Pons, the editor of Valeurs Actuelles, a magazine where Anne-Lorraine had worked as an intern, wrote on the magazine's blog: "When will this rapist with his knife leave prison? After 8, 10, 15 years? Our society must pluck up the courage to remove him from society once and for all. If we do not do this the fathers, the brothers, the uncles will. In the name of justified violence."
The next day Mr. Pons removed his post from his blog. His text was deemed an incitement to violence. It is taboo in Europe to say that if the state fails to protect the citizens, the citizens should do so themselves. There is no Second Amendment in Europe. Even European politicians from the so-called "right," like Mr. Sarkozy, are horrified at the suggestion that citizens should be allowed to protect themselves against criminals. Last year, Mr. Sarkozy told French radio: "Security is the responsibility of the state. I am against the private ownership of firearms. If you are assaulted by an armed burglar, he will use his weapon more effectively than you anyway, so you are risking your life."
The result is that in France only the criminals are armed, while decent citizens, even those as brave as Anne-Lorraine, perish.
This piece was originally published in The Washington Times on December 5, 2007 .
5. More on the incident of the islamic riots in France late 2007:
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jan/16/sensitive-urban-areas/
Quote:'Sensitive urban areas'
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Last November, 15-year-old Mouhsin and 16-year-old Lakamy were killed in Villiers-le-Bel, an immigrant suburb of Paris. The boys, joyriding on a stolen motorbike, collided at high speed with a police vehicle which happened to be passing in a neighborhood where the police normally do not venture.
Though Moushin and Lakamy were French-born and of French nationality, their families had them buried in Morocco and Senegal ââ¬â the countries of their ethnic origin. The self-imposed segregation extends even beyond death. Muslims, who claim that France does not have enough separate Islamic cemeteries, do not want to be buried near Christians or Jews.
The death of the two boys led to three nights of heavy rioting in which gangs of criminals ââ¬â invariably described in the media as ââ¬ÅFrench youthsââ¬Â ââ¬â burned down dozens of public buildings and tried to kill two police officers in retaliation.
For the first time the French police were confronted with rioters using firearms. On Nov. 28 Nicolas Sarkozy, the French President, declared that ââ¬Åopening fire at officials is completely unacceptable.ââ¬Â He promised that ââ¬Åthose who shoot at officials will face court for attempted murder.ââ¬Â Two months later Mr. Sarkozyââ¬â¢s words can be evaluated. All in all, seven delinquents have received a jail sentence for participating in the riots. No one had to stand trial for attempted murder. The longest sentence is a 12-month term. Two of the youths were convicted following the testimony of a deputy police officer. Because the court disclosed the identity of the witness, the latter had to face the consequences. When he arrived at his home he was beaten up by a group of young immigrants.
In May, the French voters elected Mr. Sarkozy as president because he had promised to restore the authority of the Republic over Franceââ¬â¢s 751 no-go areas, the so-called zones urbaines sensibles (ZUS, sensitive urban areas), where 5 million people ââ¬â 8 percent of the population ââ¬â live. During his first months in office he has been too busy with other activities, such as selling nuclear plants to Libya and getting divorced. While the French media publish nude pictures of the future (third) Mrs. Sarkozy, the situation in the ZUS has remained as ââ¬Åsensitiveââ¬Â as before.
People get mugged, even murdered, in the ZUS, but the media prefer not to write about it. When large-scale rioting erupts and officers and firemen are attacked, the behavior of the thugs is condoned with references to their ââ¬Åpovertyââ¬Â and to the ââ¬Åracismââ¬Â of the indigenous French. The French media never devote their attention to the bleak situation of intimidation and lawlessness in which 8 percent of the population, including many poor indigenous French, are forced to live. Muslim racism toward the ââ¬Åinfidelsââ¬Â is never mentioned.
Xavier Raufer, a former French intelligence officer who heads the department on organized crime and terrorism at the Institute of Criminology of the University of Paris II, thinks that organized crime has a lot to do with the indifference of the French establishment.
The ZUS are centers of drug trafficking. According to a recent report of the French governmentââ¬â¢s Interdepartmental Commission to Combat Drug Traffic and Addiction (MILDT) 550,000 people in France consume cannabis on a daily basis and 1.2 million on a regular basis. The annual cannabis consumption amounts to 208 tons for a market value of 832 million euros ($1.2 billion in U.S. dollars). MILDT estimates that there are between 6,000 and 13,000 small ââ¬Åentrepreneursââ¬Â and between 700 and 1,400 wholesalers who make a living out of dealing cannabis. The wholesalers earn up to 550,000 euros ($820,000) per year. Since they operate from within the ZUS the drug dealers are beyond the reach of the French authorities.
The ZUS exist not only because Muslims wish to live in their own areas according to their own culture and their own Shariah laws, but also because organized crime wants to operate without the judicial and fiscal interference of the French state. In France, Shariah law and mafia rule have become almost identical.
(Same as in India. Even bollywho is funded by the islamic mafia)
Mr. Raufer says that corruption is the key to understanding both the silence of the French media and the unwillingness of the French politicians to reconquer the lost territories of the republic. He suggests that Parisian journalists, intellectuals and politicians may have been bought with drug money: ââ¬ÅEnormous interests are at stake. Once such [a] vast amount of money circulates underground everything can be bought, including the culture of condonement.ââ¬Â
Recently the Islamist ideologue Tariq Ramadan was appointed professor at Leiden University, the eldest and most prestigious university in the Netherlands. His chair is being financed by the Sultan of Oman. In Europe as elsewhere, large sums of Saudi and Gulf money are being used to buy universities and media outlets. The purpose is not to promote a moderate form of Islam and to stimulate Muslim immigrants to assimilate into their Western host countries, but to do exactly the opposite. It is possible that money resulting from criminal activities within Europeââ¬â¢s own borders is being used for the same goals. In that case no one need be surprised at the vast propaganda of multiculturalism emanating from our schools, our press and our politicians.
(Well, that's what christianism - both as emanating from western countries as well as in India - is doing in the Hindu homeland. If it's good for the goose...)
Multiculturalism is a disaster. Because it is a disaster and has opened the door to organized crime, the latterââ¬â¢s money has bought everything and the praise of multiculturalism is being sung louder than ever.
Paul Belien is editor of the Brussels Journal and an adjunct fellow of [color="#0000FF"]the Hudson Institute[/color].
6. The smell of another christian crusade/reconquista against islam was already in the air (before the French riots of Nov 2007). But then the christian crusader Breivik came along and jumped the gun, and seems to have set the christian agenda back somewhat - note that the Bat Y'eor mentioned below is a famous *christian* [color="#0000FF"](I'm WRONG it seems: Elst's description says she's Jewish, see post 613 below)[/color], as I'm sure others who came to the meeting described below were too. (Sadly, Breivik's christian outburst has even set back the non-ideological=non-christian European agenda for curbing the islamisation of Europe.)
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/oct/24/bowing-to-the-islamists/
Quote:Bowing to the islamists
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Last Thursday, a group of 80 people from 15 European countries, plus Israel, Canada and the United States, convened in a conference room on the seventh floor of the European Parliament building in Brussels for a ââ¬Åcounterjihadââ¬Â meeting.
They listened to speakers such as the Egyptian-born scholar Bat Yeââ¬â¢or, author of the book ââ¬ÅEurabia,ââ¬Â who explained how the European Union (EU) has become a vehicle for the Islamization of Europe and how the EU has promoted ââ¬Åa massive Muslim immigrationââ¬Â¦ hoping that the Euro-Arab symbiosis through economic development, soft diplomacy and multiculturalism would guarantee [Europe] peace, markets and oil.ââ¬Â
The citizens of Europe are extremely worried by this Islamization process, but their political leaders impose it on them against their wish. Europe is in worse shape than America because European democracies lack two pillars of freedom that America still has ââ¬â solidly enshrined in the first and second amendments of its Constitution. In many European countries, freedom of speech no longer exists. It has been restricted by laws intended to curb so-called ââ¬Åhate speech.ââ¬Â These laws forbid people to express their worries about massive immigration and about the Islamization of their nations.
Europe, with few exceptions, such as Switzerland, is also unfamiliar with the second pillar of free societies: the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms. In countries such as Belgium even pepper spray is an illegal weapon. The result is that the law-abiding citizens are at the mercy of criminals, many of them of foreign extraction.
While the delegates at the counterjihad meeting, who had been invited to the European Parliament by one of Europeââ¬â¢s so-called far-right parties, discussed strategies to counter the spread of Islamism, EU bureaucrats convened in a meeting room two floors below. On the fifth floor of the parliament building, they discussed the ââ¬Åharmonizationââ¬Â of self-defense legislation in the 27 EU member states. This means that, if the EU gets its way, the citizens of all member states will soon be submitted to Belgiumââ¬â¢s strict rules and that pepper sprays will be banned everywhere.
Meanwhile, as became clear from the country reports given at the counterjihad meeting, Europeââ¬â¢s no-go zones are multiplying. These are areas where the police no longer dare to venture and where Islamists hold sway. Every night since the beginning of last week, immigrant youths have been torching cars and clashing with police in Amsterdamââ¬â¢s Slotervaart district. The incidents started Oct. 14 when a policewoman shot dead a 22-year old ethnic Moroccan while he was stabbing her and a colleague with a knife. Senior police officers compare the current situation in Amsterdam to the 2005 Ramadan riots in Paris. Media outside the Netherlands, however, hardly mention the riots, which aim to drive the police from Slotervaart and turn the neighborhood into a new no-go area ââ¬â yet another pocket of Eurabia on Europeââ¬â¢s soil.
Similar events are currently taking place in Brussels, the capital of neighboring Belgium and of the EU. Last Sunday, demonstrating Turkish youths ransacked an Armenian pub in the Sint-Joost-ten-Node borough. According to the pub owner, police were present at the scene but did not interfere while his pub was being demolished. The Armenian owner, who by Belgian law is not allowed to possess pepper spray, had to flee for his life. The situation in Brussels remains tense.
Fortunately, there is some good news as well. Last Sunday, the Swiss Peopleââ¬â¢s Party (SVP) won 29 percent of the votes and 62 of the 200 seats in Switzerlandââ¬â¢s federal parliament, the National Council. This is the largest number of seats that any Swiss party has ever won since 1919.
[color="#0000FF"]During its campaign the SVP used a controversial poster, showing three white sheep standing on the Swiss flag. One of the white sheep kicked a black sheep off the flag. The caption read: ââ¬ÅBringing safety.ââ¬Â The SVP poster wanted to emphasize that foreigners commit four times as many crimes as the Swiss do and that this situation will no longer be tolerated. Everyone knows which segment of the foreign population the term ââ¬Åblack sheepââ¬Â refers to.
Even law-abiding foreigners living in Switzerland realize what the SVPââ¬â¢s true message is: Get rid of those aliens who perpetrate crimes. Parties in the rest of Europe would be persecuted for using similar posters because people are not allowed to contemplate the issue, but the Swiss are able to raise their voices. It is no coincidence that the freedom-loving Alpine republic consistently refuses to join the EU.[/color]
Paul Belien is editor of the Brussels Journal and an adjunct fellow of the Hudson Institute.
The reason Belien's WashingtonTimes/BrusselsJournal writings are pasted above is because
a. it contains some facts about the ground situation in France as at 2007 and which is being repeated in Belgium (and NL, etc): UK and India aren't the only nations where little islami-stans are being carved out. Or where the sexual jihad takes place.
b. note how, like the "barenakedislam" site in point 3 of the previous post, WashingtonTimes and BrusselsJournal are also christian (who always choose to list Judaism alongside as a typical afterthought in their arguments of victimhood), though the BrusselsJournal is less overtly christian - but their leanings become apparent from their choosing to mention the religious identity of the victims of islamania. All three sites - and many more like them - mouth off against islam invading their space, yet - as Elst revealed - the IIRC "Christian Templeton Foundation" in the US specifically hired Meera Nanda to reinforce islamic jihad in India and rebuff Hindus from even criticising the religion. And many other christian organisations are spearheading similar operations for islam and against Hindus in India (always taking care to hide how their activities are actually for enlarging the christian share in India by antagonising and weakening Hindus with islamaniac help. That's why christianism in and outside India is so protective of islam. Their vocal encouragement of islam actually helps to keep their primary interest - which is to fan the christian flame in India - invisible and protected from Hindu criticism, i.e. it makes their ideologically-motivated christianism in their opportunistic defence of Indian islam invisible.**)
This is christian two-facedness in action. Like the christo-British Raj did, christianism supports islamania in India in order to destroy heathenism there, as christianism simply doesn't have the numbers to take the nation for itself and needs islamic help. (Also other IF members seemed to argue that foreign christian nations appear to have promised the Indian subcontinent to islam, perhaps as a trade for leaving "western" territory alone. In any case, the deal is at least for a large part of India, since christianism has its own plans for the NE and S. Neither islam nor christianism are holding to the bargain, yet they work in tandem anyway since their #1 enemy is heathenism and Hindu India is Unfinished Business for both.)
** Not even Elst appears to properly question why the Christian Templeton Foundation is so vocal in supporting islamic matters in India - he devoted more time to explaining why the Hindu intellectual deconstruction (and de-recognition of the validity) of islam is correct.
Instead of Hindu rebuttals of Meera Nanda's defence of islam focussing on islam, Hindus should launch a similar intellectual assault on christianism every time the little schemer (Nanda) attacks Hindus' religion. In doing so, you hit the sneaky third party - christianism - where it hurts: There's a far higher chance that Nanda's true colours/her ideological interests - and certainly the anger of her western christian paymasters in the Christian Templeton Foundation - will display much sooner if Hindus were to call them out on
their religion. Besides, never attack only one of the two heads of the christoislamic hydra when heathens ought to be attacking both: attacking only one head will give sufficient respite to the other to save its strength for a future assault on unsaved kaffirs. Personally, I'd say go for the heart: utterly - that is, repeatedly, vocally, unapologetically - keep debunking them both (and keep equating them both, with examples for illustration, since they
are one and the same ideology). Do NOT make temporary allowances for one while attacking the other, in the hope that the odds will be better* - because the enemies collude with each other all the time and feel closer to each other than they would ever do with Hindus and will readily stab Hindus at any moment, even in unison.
* E.g. as Hindu nationalists invariably hope for better chances against islam whenever they allow the christianism parasite to piggyback with them in the stand against love jihad (though christianism operates its own love/demographic jihad and has far greater success in numbers to show for it: count how many Hindu families have a christian infiltrator married into them now, whom the Hindu body/family has not rejected).
Heathens should always stand firm and attack both aspects of christoislamia - that is christianism
and islam - simultaneously: neither is acceptable in heathen territory. And this must be made clear to christians trying to take advantage of Hindus in christianism's personal battles against islam, as well as to a Hindu audience who needs to recognise that christianism=islamism, with christianism being a cunning vampire compared to the islamic zombie. But both are the most vicious parasites, preying on the heathen host nation, with intent to suck out all its heathen blood. Christianism is actually even more insidious than islam, since its assault is incredibly stealthy and far more successful and goes easily undetected, whereas Hindus only know to wake to the threat islam poses and are easily won over by christian offers of "dialogue", "peace" and "teaming up against islam". (Christianism has a pact with islam to carve up the nation between them. They don't trust each other, but christianism knows Hindus are useful idiots to offer them help in christian issues against islam. I say the sexual/love jihad so severely affecting Indian christianism is not a tragedy at all for Hindus. All it means is that enemies are transferred from the christian to the islamic tag, especially now that
both have threatened demographic warfare in Kerala.) Also, christianisation makes fertile ground for subsequent islamisation, as seen in all parts of Asia and Africa, whereas heathens who are not first weakened fatally by the christian leech into enabling islam, offer greater resistance to islamisation of their nations (the clearest example is in Hindus' own history: Hindu India offered better resistance against islam before christian rule undermined this Hindu resistance).
Anyway, the thing to remember is that - as everyone actually already knows - Hindus can expect no help from anyone, and no allies.* (Eastern heathens can't really do anything as they have their own troubles. Neither can western heathens - oh, these last do exist, and are not related to weird reconstructionisms - since they're too small in number and also have their own trials such as being persecuted, and in regaining their homelands from christianism or even securing the right to their religious places.) But the christo-west will act in its own interest against islam within its own territory, yet seek to reduce Hindus' territory in favour of islam at the same time: they want christianism not islam to reign supreme in their homes AND they want heathenism dead wherever it may exist and ideally replaced with some monotheism, preferring even islam to any heathenism.
* Well, other than the very few people like Elst I suppose, who offer moral support and who are not aligned with the christian ideology (as far as I can tell) and therefore support India's Hindus against the jihad - even so far as occasionally criticising christianism in favour of Hindus. Because they have the same battle with islam in their own backyard and they can either identify "allies" in Hindus (despite Hindus having been made inept by christianism, so that they do not really make helpful allies) or at least recognise in India's Hindus a people sharing the same experience vis-a-vis islam. [Having said that, just wish Hindus wouldn't expand Elst's role and sympathies and thus take him to be an expert on *heathenism*. But that's probably too much to hope for..]
[/color]
' />