Historicity of Jesus - 2 - Printable Version +- Forums (http://india-forum.com) +-- Forum: Indian History & Culture (http://india-forum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Indian History (http://india-forum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Thread: Historicity of Jesus - 2 (/showthread.php?tid=362) |
Historicity of Jesus - 2 - ramana - 03-02-2011 Quote at end of the book: Quote:The early Christian Church was also apocalyptically oriented and, under Paul's leadership,organized hierarchically, with everyone told to be subservient to the state Historicity of Jesus - 2 - Guest - 03-07-2011 Was "Age of Reason" by Thomas Paine discussed under the development of Christian Church? ps: I tried searching the forums, the search feature of this forum being not that great (or it is user error on my part), I could not see anything in the results. Historicity of Jesus - 2 - ramana - 03-09-2011 The Invention of the Jewish People Verso (October 19, 2009) | ISBN: 1844674223 | 332 pages | Quote:Bestselling new analysis of Jewish history by a leading Israeli historian. A historical tour de force that demolishes the myths and taboos that have surrounded Jewish and Israeli history, The Invention of the Jewish People offers a new account of both that demands to be read and reckoned with. Was there really a forced exile in the first century, at the hands of the Romans? Should we regard the Jewish people, throughout two millennia, as both a distinct ethnic group and a putative nationââ¬âreturned at last to its Biblical homeland? So in same manner the derivative religio-political movements were created by Romans and Arabs..... Historicity of Jesus - 2 - ramana - 03-16-2011 Derek Murphy, "Jesus Potter Harry Christ: The Fascinating Parallels Between Two of the World's Most Popular Literary Characters" Publisher: H o ly Bl asph emy | 2011 | ISBN: 0615430937 | 490 pages | Quote:"Particularly absorbing and highly topical: namely, the idea that nothing substantially separates Jesus of Nazareth from Harry Potter except that most human beings believe in the historical reality of the former. Instead, both figures entertain astonishingly parallel personality traits that derive from universal myths. As part of the continuing debate over the nature of Christ, not only among Christians but between them and today's wave of atheist thinkers, Jesus Potter, Harry Christ is timely. Linking this analysis, moreover, to J. K. Rowling's globally popular character further heightens its relevancy." Jeff Crouse, Ph.D - Parmenides Historicity of Jesus - 2 - Guest - 03-26-2011 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bart-d-ehrman/the-bible-telling-lies-to_b_840301.html Quote:Most people wouldn't put it that way, since the Bible is, after all, sacred Scripture for millions on our planet. But good Christian scholars of the Bible, including the top Protestant and Catholic scholars of America, will tell you that the Bible is full of lies, even if they refuse to use the term. And here is the truth: Many of the books of the New Testament were written by people who lied about their identity, claiming to be a famous apostle -- Peter, Paul or James -- knowing full well they were someone else. In modern parlance, that is a lie, and a book written by someone who lies about his identity is a forgery. Historicity of Jesus - 2 - ramana - 04-19-2011 Assyrians and Jews:3000 years of common history Discover Magazine. Historicity of Jesus - 2 - acharya - 05-09-2011 [size="7"]The great Jesus swindle [/size] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4shqQJDdCA&feature=related The greatest lie ever told. You can download an audio version of this video at http://patcondell.libsyn.com/ Subscribe via iTunes atââ¬Â¨http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=262679978 BOOK OF VIDEO TRANSCRIPTS AVAILABLE http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback/godless-and-free/7864233 ALSO AVAILABLE ON AMAZON KINDLE http://www.amazon.co.uk/Godless-And-Free/dp/B0048EL6M0 Website http://www.patcondell.net ------------------ Self destructive idea in human history Historicity of Jesus - 2 - dhu - 05-11-2011 Comments Pantheism and Biblical Christianity By: Bill Muehlenberg Quote:In the famous painting on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo there is the memorable scene of the creator God extending his finger to the outstretched hand of the newly formed Adam. The imagery makes clear that Adam is a creation of God, not an extension of him. Creator and creation are distinct. Historicity of Jesus - 2 - dhu - 05-26-2011 [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_did_those_feet_in_ancient_time"]Jerusalem[/url] Words written by William Blake PROMENADE CONCERTS FOR YOUR VENUE INCLUDES POPULAR MUSIC HALL SONGS AND BRITISH PATRIOTIC ANTHEMS PERFORMED BY JILL DANIELS CONTACT DETAILS BELOW Quote:And did those feet in ancient time Historicity of Jesus - 2 - dhu - 07-08-2011 Quote:Inkling Historicity of Jesus - 2 - Husky - 07-08-2011 Quote:Inkling "Ooooh, oooh, I know the answer. Me me!" :raises paw: The answer is (Kirk Douglas in) Spartacus and all his freed-"slaves", of course: they got mocked, beaten and crucified. That makes them Just Men as per Plato (that was the logic of the argument "Inkling" was trying for, wasn't it?) And while the historical Spartacus' own end is now apparently debated ("did he perhaps die in battle after all?"), the historically-documented end of some 5000/6000 of the ex-slave freemen following him was in fact crucifixion. But in any case, the one character we know could never have got crucified is the entity which christians call "jesus christ". He simply never existed. Naturally Plato's Republic would have been used by the christian fiction-writers in order to invent the non-existent "jesus christ" in such a way as to make him sound like the "just man" described by Hellenistic Philosophy. I.e. they either used Hellenistic writings in order to make the fictional "jesus christ" character seem the fulfillment/culmination of a Platonic ideal or this is simply something christians are desperately reading into it. But then, that's what christianism/islam/false religions do: write themselves/their fictions into others' histories/religious literatures. Sadly, just like the lying christians* pathetically erred in declaring the fictive jesus 'christ' to be the Jewish Messiah (when jesus specifically *can't* have been the messiah - see Jewish arguments e.g. at simpletoremember.com: Jews do not accept Jesus as the Messiah because...), jesus has even less to do with Hellenismos (including its Philosophy). But all that's not even taking jesus' non-existence into consideration: which is only *one* of the fatal blows to the theory. Ancient Hellenes (as well as modern) have argued christianism's entire and utter unrelatedness to all of Hellenismos (which includes all Philosophy) at length. * That christians would lie is not in question: christianism makes them do it. I parrot myself parroting Julian, who explains so incontrovertibly that Christianism Is An Evil Lie: Quote:Emperor Julian writes in Contra Galilaeos ("Against the Christians"): Back to the topic: Julian didn't get "mocked, beaten and crucified". But christians (=evil terrorists) plotted his death multiple times. In the end - as christians owned up - a christian plot had Julian skewered. (And so he went off to Olympus apparently, where we're told he is united with his Divine Parents, his Gods. But aren't all pious Heroes?) So, not crucified. But a Just Man nevertheless. And many Hellenes of the emperor's time and after - who are the sole people to know what Plato meant (since they, like Plato, were Hellenes, while 'Inkling' is not -> instead, he's of the kind that genocided the Hellenes) - many Hellenes of the emperor's time and after certainly recognised in Julian a fulfillment of all of Plato's best ideals. Especially as includes an Ideal Emperor*. Who am I to argue. (* Just to make it clear: Emperor Julian as Platonic Ideal for emperor is a *famous* topic in his biographies. It's not merely a nice way of describing Julian. And Julian regarded Marcus Aurelius as his standard for just imperial governance.) Score: - Julian +1 (Again. Still. "How does he do it?" <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> ) - "jesus christ" (jeebusjehovallah) forever stuck at 0 if not negative infinity. Blame it on his non-existence. Historicity of Jesus - 2 - dhu - 07-13-2011 Scribd Timeline of John Hudson http://www.scribd.com/JohnHud Particularly interesting is American Empire/Roman Empire http://www.scribd.com/doc/30493013/American-Empire-Roman-Empire --------------------- Historicity of Jesus - 2 - ramana - 07-16-2011 Dhu, Pretty good summary. So even Shakepeare's works are repelete with the parody. Historicity of Jesus - 2 - dhu - 07-16-2011 [quote name='ramana' date='16 July 2011 - 02:30 AM' timestamp='1310763148' post='112196'] Dhu, Pretty good summary. So even Shakepeare's works are repelete with the parody. [/quote] The revelation for us is that western normatizing is always at a grosser level. The 'code' is written in at the formative moment of "creation"; heathenish learning is not possible in such a situation, only revelation, the unveiling of the "true meaning". Even their 'narratives' are not for learning, but for "figuring out" the (true) meaning. That is they even have normative narratives. No communication, much less exchange, is possible in such a situation; only invective. When the invective is not clear, symbology is assumed; the vast majorty of their "commons" flounder their entire lives in this symbology. The elite are the "privy" Alienation when it happens in the normatized is the path to the privyhood. That is, the path to the elite, to surety, to universality itself, is alienation. This alienation can either lead towards the secular (which is the grosser) or towards the religious (which is the higher) Normativity is strengthened when the code is revealed, for it is a vindication of the reality and therefore of the universality of the code. Even when the code is revealed to be the grosser level, the code dynamic is taken as a universal truth. From such a dynamic, no appreciation of an alhernate heathen reality is possible. Universality of codes is strengthened by revelation of the code Now watch as they transform Kalidas as the Shake-Spear of the East. Perhaps Kalidas was abusing Krishna, or perhaps even Buddha. Historicity of Jesus - 2 - dhu - 07-27-2011 Following is an account for the origin of the idol worship canard in Monotheism. It has to be emperor worship elevated to the status of canard and invective *at the level of academia (represented by Josephus)* and as a substitute for the acceptance of imperial sway. The idol worship canard in no way was existent a priori to the colonial project in heathen canaan, nor is Roman Emperor worship itself different from other forms of heathen devotion. (It must be remembered that it is just one faction of the roman polity, *the roman catholic faction*, which destroyed the Druids and Canaanites. This phenomenon in no way reflects upon the heathenness of the whole Roman society, even though the antecedents are traceable specifically to the Glaucon-Socrates exchange). Ramana, Husky, does the following make sense.. Quote:brihaspati wrote: This is precisely the problem. Conflict was always there in the heathen society, there is nothing significant in this by itself. Factions will always form and there will be supporters in each faction, and there will be some voicing a grievance. The rebellion of grievance is in no way transformed into a ââ¬Årevolutionary movementââ¬Â in heathen society. In fact, the ââ¬Årevolutionary movementââ¬Â only manifests at the level of conceptualization in socio-political theory. This happened for the first time in Monotheism. For example, we know that (Titus of) Josephus is a mirror image of the (Jesus of) NT and that the NT is a parody of Josephus and not the other way around (but with tell-tale reverse situations occurring in isolation). If Josephus is so perfectly crafted, then what of its ââ¬Åneutral observationsââ¬Â regarding the natives refusing to ââ¬Åbow before the emperor/idolââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬â¢ in ââ¬Ëtheological principleââ¬â¢ rather than just rebellion? When Shivaji rebelled against the Emperor, did he do so because he was opposed to idol/emperor worship? Of course not (although the converted omniscients will have an extremely hard time visualizing such). The ââ¬Åobservationsââ¬Â regarding "refusal to emperor/idol worship" in Josephus are simply the ground against which the anti-semitic (meaning anti-ME) invective of the NT can manifest. Josephus is the "social observation" and is posited as the 'normality'. And in framing the case of the native rebellion as a case of theological disagreement, an intermediary (of theological principle) was able to be posited as the ââ¬Åfulcrumââ¬Â of the conflict, allowing for further ambiguation (eg, the rebels had founded a world theory of "anti-slavery", "freedom", "liberty", etc). At the level of Josephus, this ambiguation is "social theory"; at the level of NT, it is religious invective. Such ambiguation is present in the texts themselves and works as long as the social theory (Josephus) part remains isolated from the religion (NT) which commands action. When a relationship between the two becomes obvious, the macaulayite nature of the ââ¬Årevolutionary movementââ¬Â also is seen. The need to normatize against a standard may itself prevent the "revolution" from taking off on its own, ie both the elites and the followers cannot conceptualize beyond the macaulayite lifestyle. In fact, the ambiguation which is "useful to the elitesââ¬Â and the "delight of the rabble-rouser" needs a sustained academia/seminary for maintenance. When discrepancies are encountered eg the discovery of heathen native america or heathen india, the discourse automatically shifts to incorporate those at the level of discourse itself (Enlightenment with its binary of sterilized social science and orientalist romanticism). The elites are quite secondary here. Historicity of Jesus - 2 - ramana - 07-29-2011 Jesus Lied - He Was Only Human: Debunking The New Testament by: CJ Werleman Dangerous Little Books; 1 edition (October 5, 2010) | ISBN: 0956427618 | 538 pages | Quote:Jesus Lied. He Was Only Human' is arguably the most comprehensive and exhaustive debunking of the Christian myth on bookshelves today. Like a forensic accountant, Werleman meticulously pulls apart the New Testament thread-by-thread until the greatest lie ever told if exposed for all to see. Werleman not only reveals the suffering - Jesus caused his early followers, he cleverly demonstrates that the New Testament is brimming with contradictory views, conflicting accounts, historical flaws, and irreconcilable discrepancies. Comprehensive. Funny. Entertaining. A must read for anyone who wants to silence their evangelical friends. Historicity of Jesus - 2 - dhu - 07-29-2011 The idol-breaker canard was the problematizing motif to transform the macaulayite into a "revolutionary". This cannot happen at the level of experience or devotion or rebellion but only at the level of academia. The identity of heathen culture was overtaken by this "revolutionary" class. I will post the entire timeline and dynamic within 2 days , both for the OT and NT. Herodotus normatized at the level of Moshe. Aegyptica, Babylonika, and Persica were placed into the Septuagint and sought to normatize the rest of the ME. Later this was normatized at the level of jeebus by Josephus. Historicity of Jesus - 2 - dhu - 08-01-2011 Quote:We cannot prove that Moses ever existed but as we cannot explain the development The author above is typically concerned with mere historicity. However, there is a parallel in the above in the Ghent group's writing on AIT: The Aryans were needed to explain the "observation" of Religion in India. Of course, it was precisely the observers who brought Religion to India and Religion does not exist in India outside of their peculiar problematizing lens. Historicity of Jesus - 2 - dhu - 08-01-2011 delete Historicity of Jesus - 2 - ramana - 08-01-2011 Europe especially Mediterreanan Europe has bore the brunt of repeated invasions of force and cultural ideas from the East: Egypt, Hittites, Persians etc. Europe has been on a quest to delink itself from the East since antiquity. You can see this in the Virgin birth of Jesus to show a delink from the East. The gospel's by Luke and Mark are the first attempts to fashion a delinked religion from the East in order to unify Europe under the Roman imperial rule. They needed that to fight the Goths and other Germanic tribes. Even Hitler's Nazism is a modern attmpt to do the same with his slogan "Without Rome, Without Jude,...." We see the NATO intervention in Libya as an attempt to reassert old Pax Romana on North Africa as a new recoqusita of those areas from Islam. But for Islam North Afirca would be part of current Europe. |