Quote:When, long ago, I first learned that some theorized that Jesus had never existed as an historical figure, I dismissed the notion as mere crankism, as most still do. Indeed, Rudolf Bultmann, supposedly the arch-skeptic, quipped that no sane person could doubt that Jesus existed (though he himself came surprisingly close to the same opinion, as did Paul Tillich). For a number of years I held a more or less Bultmannian estimate of the historical Jesus as a prophet heralding the arrival of the eschatological Kingdom of God, an end to which his parables, faith healings and exorcisms were directed. Jesus had, I thought, predicted the coming of the Son of Man, an angelic figure who should raise the dead and judge mankind. When his cleansing of the temple invited the unforgiving ire of the Sadducee establishment, in cahoots with the Romans, he sealed his own doom. He died by crucifixion, and a few days later his disciples began experiencing visions of him raised from the dead. They concluded that he himself was now to be considered the Son of Man, and they expected his messianic advent in the near future.

Quote:One of the characteristic pursuits of the current phase of historical Jesus research, the so-called Third Quest, has been the serious attempt to locate Jesus within first-century CE Judaism, to seek a Jesus who could be found plausible within his Jewish context. Comparatively less emphasis has been laid on the question as to whether or how the contextually plausible picture of Jesus also suits and accounts for the history of the reception of Jesus in early Christianity.



By integrating the Jewish context, the teaching of Jesus and Christian reception history into one explanation, the continuum perspective seeks to reveal a Jesus who would both be fitting within his Jewish context and would also help to explain and understand early Christian stances. Thus, according to this perspective, a historically plausible picture of Jesus is one that can be placed in the Judaism-Christianity continuum.

Quote:The Synchronized Chronology resolves the structural problems of Egyptian chronology and then outlines the correct history of the Middle East and Mediterranean time of Abraham and his wandering into the Empire of Alexander the Great. Recognizing some overlapping of dates and names in Manetho's List of Kings, frees history to place pharaohs and dynasties where archaeology supports their existence. This resolves a myriad of discrepancies and unlikely assumptions that historians have been forced to swallow, and neatly opens the way to synchronizing Egyptian dynasties with Biblical chronology.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREFACE

1. WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS CHRONOLOGY?

THE OBJECTIVE

THE SOLUTION

THE KEY TO THE SYNCHRONISMS

2. FOUNDATIONS OF CONVENTIONAL CHRONOLOGY

MANETHO

BIBLICAL CHRONOLOGY

THE STARTING POINT

3. THE EXODUS AND THE END OF THE MIDDLE KINGDOM OF EGYPT

THE MOST IMPORTANT SYNCHRONISM

THE PAPYRUS IPUWER

THE EL ARISH SHRINE

THE ERMITAGE PAPYRUS

THE INVASION

THE AMALEKITES

THE DEFEAT OF THE HYKSOS/AMALEKITES

4. THE CONQUEST AND THE TIME OF THE JUDGES

THE MIDDLE BRONZE AGE

THE BIBLICAL MIDDLE BRONZE AGE

THE CONQUEST OF CANAAN

ISRAELITE OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE

JERICHO

SHECHEM

ABRAHAM AND THE AMORITE MIGRATION

THE ORIGIN OF THE ALPHABET

5. THE 18TH DYNASTY AND THE UNITED KINGDOM

THE UNITED KINGDOM

THE THEBAN DYNASTY

QUEEN SHEBA

6. THE WARS OF EGYPT AND ISRAEL

SOLOMON’S PUNISHMENT

ASA BATTLES AMENHOTEP II

THE MITANNI, THE KHURRIANS, AND THE RISE OF ASSYRIA

7. ISRAEL AND DAMASCUS AT WAR PART 1 OF THE TELL EL-AMARNA LETTERS

JEHOSAPHAT’S CAPTAINS

THE MESHA STELE

8. JERUSALEM IN THE TIME OF AKHNATON PART 2 OF THE TELL EL AMARNA

LETTERS

JERUSALEM

IVORY

AKHNATON

9. THE END OF THE BRONZE AGE

MANETHO

ITALY

ROME

SICILY

SPAIN

TROY

THE END OF THE BRONZE AGE

EARTHQUAKES

MIGRATION

DROUGHT

POLITICAL COLLAPSE

WARFARE

IRON

10. NEW LIGHT ON THE GREEK DARK AGES

HOMER

OTHER PEOPLES OF ASIA MINOR

LITERACY

ARGOS

11. THE RISE OF ASSYRIA. PART 3 OF THE TELL EL AMARNA LETTERS

THE INTERNATIONAL SCENE

BABYLONIA

ASSYRIA

ANOTHER DARK AGE

SHALMANESER

SHALMANESER ATTACKS PHOENICIA

SHALMANESER’S SYRIAN WAR

THE KING OF HATTI

THE AGE OF THE AMARNA SCRIPT

MITANNI

12. SAMARIA AS A BENCHMARK FOR ARCHEOLOGY

ARCHAEOLOGY IN “CANAAN”

LOOKING FOR A BENCHMARK

THE LACHISH OSTRACA

MEGIDDO

13. THE THIRD INTERMEDIATE PERIOD IN EGYPT

THE CASE FOR SHOSHENQ AS SHISHAK

SHOSHENQ IN THE SYNCHRONIZED CHRONOLOGY

THE PHOENICIAN SCRIPT

SAMARIA AS THE BENCHMARK

ISRAEL

LIBYA WITH A DISTRACTED ASSYRIA

14. WHO WERE THE HITTITES?

THE ARCHIVE

A MIXED PEOPLE

HITTITE ORIGINS

THE KHIRBET KERAK PEOPLE

THE HATTI LANDS

GREEK REFERENCES TO HITTITES

THE CHALDEANS

THE URARTIANS

THE CIMMERIAN INVASION

THE TWO HITTITES

UR OF THE CHALDEAS

15. CHALDEAN ART

THE CONVENTIONAL ORDER

PHASE 1

PHASE 2

PHASE 3

EAST AND WEST HITTITE COMPARED

THE SCRIPT

MALATYA

PHRYGIA

THE CHALDEAN SECRET WRITING

A ROYAL “HITTITE” BURIAL IN CARCHEMISH

16. THE BATTLE OF CARCHMISH

PSAMATICH (SETI-PTAH-MAAT)

NECHO (RAMSES II)

JUDAH

THE BATTLE

THE OTHER SIDE

HOPHRA (MERNEPTAH HOTPHIRMAE)

THE ISRAEL STELE

17. RAMSES III AND HIS TIME

THE HISTORICAL SCENE

THE HARRIS PAPYRUS

THE EGYPTIAN RECORD

WHO ARE THE P-R-S-TT?

TELL EL YAHUDIYEH

THE NECROPOLIS

18. THE PEOPLE OF THE SEA

THE BATTLES

WHERE IS THE EGYPTIAN RECORD?

19. SUMMARY

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Quote:www.gnfcw.com/Muhammad.htm



After several successful journeys to Syria, Muhammad married Khadija in a Christian ceremony with the vows administered by Khadija's cousin, Waraqa bin

Quote:it is quite clear that Islam was a social engineering movement similar to Nazism than Communism. Jung likens Nazism to Islam. The initial Communistic rubric represented by Summaya bint Khayyat and the fleeing of the first martyrs to refuge in Christian Ethiopia was converted to the Nazi strain subsequently. This last conversion nativizes the rubric.



Summaya bint Kayyat means toxic d/o King :?: : a direct attack upon the Kshayathriyata of Persia. The slave Bilal story was also part of this initial social engineering



I believe that Gandhi was typed incorrectly by Jung who worked for the OSS. :?:

Gandhi must have been typed as a creative, which he was not. The creative when frustrated turns inwards and consumes itself. And this subsequently allows the creation of a nativized Nazi upon the scorched Earth.{Give examples} Gandhi did not consume himself as desried by the colonial but allowed the true native to finish him off. Thus India was saved. No Nazi shell could be implanted in India and only the communistic remained, stranded without issue. {Explain how Commies are intellectually stranded and how DIE is also part of this no connections to the roots.}



The Nestorian allowed infringement into Persia in guise of a nativized Church; subsequently the St Thomasians showed up: and finally the Radhanite:?: forwards ushered in Islam itself.



[i]{Brilliant. Also show it doesn't have to be one person or group pushing it. Ideas take on their own gravity and develop a following.}{/i]





Hitler was correctly typed, and like Saddam rebelled, but was brought to suicide after the plan was effected: martyrology was not needed in these cases. Thus martyrology is a second option in cases of type failure as with Gandhi.