Man, islamis must be the most ignorant people in the world if the guy from The Rebuttal That Wasn't is anything to go by. I've never seen so much (willful?) ignorance in one medium-sized post. Every single 'point' is wrong. Could islami have been more wrong if it tried? Non-existent allah must be proud of this incompetent and dimwitted faithful leading the ummah.
Purple stuff is my own comments. I'd post more links in my comments, but I'm strapped for time and everyone at IF knows these links already as IF members are the ones who put them up. (The many threads on islamism are a good place to start.)
<!--QuoteBegin-acharya+May 1 2008, 02:35 AM-->QUOTE(acharya @ May 1 2008, 02:35 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->âIslam and the absence of Buddhist terroristsâ: Rebuttal to Chan Akya of Asia Times
1)Â Â Â Â The Sinhalese-Tamil (Buddhist-Hindu) civil war in Sri Lanka is of course taken toll of thousands of lives, and as of last week was on the cover story of all major news organizations. The Sri Lankan government and the Tamils are both accused of terror tactics and committing atrocities.
There's a major christian hand in this. And LTTE is a christian terrorist organisation with money flooding in from foreign christos. See Sri Lanka thread
2)Â Â Â The Cambodian killing fields were red in blood, not because the Khemers were docile Buddhists.
Khmer Rouge maniacs were openly anti-Buddhist communists. The victims were all Buddhists. The perpetrators were all communists. Watch any travel documentary on the Buddhist temples of Cambodia and the number of Buddhist skulls of victims of the communist Khmer Rouge tyrants. The communist Khmer Rouge would particularly massacre the Buddhists in the temples in order to make the people dread going to their temples and to defile the sacred site.
But I forget, it would be haraam for islami to learn the truth as it involves watching documentaries about kaffiri Buddhist temples. We all know what the islami does to Buddhist sites: blow it up, like their faithful islami heroes did the Bamiyan and the Swat Buddhas.
3)Â Â Â The violent perpetuated in Buddhist Vietnam between rivals (US as well as Vietnamese) was more violent than any we have seen in recent times.
N Vietnam was communist and christian (read Avro Manhattan -
http://freetruth.50webs.org/D3.htm#Vietnam who wrote about the "The Catholics of North Vietnam, a state within a state"). South Vietnam was under a christian dictatorship, and its Buddhist population was terorrised by the christo government and christo minority. As always. (Again, see
http://freetruth.50webs.org/D3.htm#Vietnam)
4)Â Â Â Where was Mahayana Buddhism during the Sun Yet Sun and Maoist civil war?
Maoists terrorising people again? How unprecented
arcasm
5)Â Â Â Where was Buddhist âahimsaâ (non-violence) during the Cultural Revolution?
Cultural Revolution was the Chinese communists terrorising the Chinese population. Many Buddhist and Taoist victims. And this communist terrorism in China is ongoing.
6)Â Â Â Why was Buddhist-Taoist philosophy unable to âto fill the poor with greater optimism about their lotâ during the Japanese invasion of Korea?
Japan Taoist? Mwahahaha. Ignorant islami argument.
<i>WWII</i> Japan was brainwashed by Nazism - a christoislami ideology, as the
islamic Handzar nazis and croatian ustashe and catholic-protestant German nazis show. The Korean victims were Buddhists.
7)Â Â Â Why was Buddhist philosophy in hiding during the rape of Nanking by Buddhist (Japanese) soldiers?
See above. The Chinese victims were Buddhists and Taoists.
8)Â Â Â Why was the âenlightenmentâ absent during the abduction of 300,000 Korean women by Buddhist (Japanese) soldiers in Korea?
Again. See above. The victims were Buddhists.
9)Â Â Â Why doesnât Mahayana Buddhist-Taoist philosophy stop the genocide of Ughurs?
:blink Chinese government and its army - what's harassing the islami Uighurs - are communist. Islamic loser who wrote this 'article' can't get it through his head. E Asian does not mean Buddhist when the perpetrators are particularly anti-Buddhist communists, christos, islamis and/or nazis.
10) The human rights records of Laos, and Burma are not written in gold in the history books of tolerance and enlightenment.
Again, see record of communism in Laos and Burma. Islami should stop being racist and pointing at Laotian and Burmese communists as if they are Buddhists just because he's so inept he can't tell the difference between one E Asian and the other
11) The Thai massacres of Muslims in Thailand should not be a reason to criticize all Buddhists!
Islami propagandist finally made his way to the argument he wanted to make. All the above is now supposed to make us think the Thai are the instigators when it is innocent Buddhist monks and lay Buddhists who regularly get beheaded by islamiterrorists, while the Thai Buddhist police only catch the islamiterrorists not regular folks (unless harbouring islamiterrorists).
Thailand took over some Malay land. But just before, islam also took over Malaysia - so why doesn't islam get lost from what is Buddhist land?
All Buddhist countries have seen unprecedented violence in the past 70 years. To pretend otherwise is disingenuous!
Islami is not fooling anyone. All over the world where islam has encroached, be it Greece (Anatolia 'Turkey', Cyprus), Serbian land, African countries for instance Sudan and Nigeria, Israel, Persia (see Zoroastrian Genocide by islam at
http://www.vohuman.org/SiteMap/ZoroastrianGenocide.htm), Iranian lands, greater India, SE Asian region including the Phillipines, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Russia's borders with Chechnya - it's all a living hell thanks to islam.
Islami who wrote these false arguments needs to get an education. First it needs to stop being a rabid racist who thinks that just because someone looks 'E Asian' they 'must be' Buddhist. I know it may be too much for its islamic brain, but it should at least <i>attempt</i> to learn to distinguish between someone whois E Asian but is a communist/christo/islami/nazi, and someone who is a Buddhist. Then it should learn the actual facts and history of christoislamicommunazism.
Is it any wonder free people <i>all over</i> have reason to find islam an odious religion of terrible barbarity? We want none of it thanks.
http://rupeenews.com/moins-articles/muha...%E2%80%9D/
[right][snapback]81114[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Is he the best islam's got in its defence? Yikes, islam's influence on people's intelligence is worse than I thought...
Maybe people should stand back and just blow lightly and see islam fall over crumbling to dust by the weight of its own ignorance and of being so terribly wrong all the time.