All this <i>still</i> means nothing but utter dubiousness by - who else - the Arch Charlatans, the christomedia in India:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Malegaon Blast Case - ATS Credibility not Hindutva on Trial</b>
4th update - There are now 4 contradictory versions on the origin of this transcript. CNN-IBN says its a tape, NDTV says its an eyewitness account of a phone conversation, Indian Express says its a hearsay account of conversation in a room in Ujjain where, apart from Ramji and the Sadhvi, a third person was [...]
<b>What came first - Transcript or the Eyewitness ?</b>
There are now 4 contradictory versions on the origin of the transcript produced in court in the Malegaon Blast Case.
CNN-IBN says its a tape,
NDTV says its an eyewitness account of a phone conversation,
Indian Express says its a hearsay account of conversation in a room in Ujjain where, apart from Ramji and the Sadhvi, a third [...]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Thereafter Offstumped did some stepping back when they heard the 'news' of the 'Grand Confession' of Purohit - see below. (Some commenters in Offstumped have reasonably supposed he may be a plant to drown the army - but perhaps he was merely tortured into confessing like two of the other accused, see post #17 above.)
I don't know if Offstumped remained at neutral even after the following ridiculous reporting by TOI was revealed - linked off a comment on the Offstumped page:
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Lt-Col_Purohit_admits_he_was_mastermind_of_Malegaon/articleshow/3683035.cms
<b>While TOI's piece is titled so definitely (or rather deceptively): "I was Malegaon mastermind, admits Lt-Col"</b>
And yet one reads:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->7 Nov 2008
[...]
It is learnt that Purohit, who was arrested on November 5, <b>admitted</b> to supplying the deadly RDX and weapons to members of the Abhinav Bharat, a radical Hindu outfit. Sources said the Mumbai's Anti-Terrorism Squad was planning to question another serving army officer in this connection whose name cropped up during Purohit's interrogation. <b>However, the confessional statement given to the police is not admissible in court.</b>
(Inadmissable? Why, because it came by way of torturing him?)
Sources said Purohit was conclusively cornered after he was confronted with telephone records that showed his links with another accused, retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay. "I am the mastermind of the blast. I arranged for the RDX and weapons but I can't understand how the weapons reached Abhinav Bharat members," sources quoted Purohit as telling police. Abhinav Bharat is the Hindu extremist group which wanted to avenge the terror attacks by Islamist groups. Several members of the group had links with other saffron outfits.
<span style='color:red'>While no anti-terrorism squad (ATS) officer was willing to comment on the reported confession, ATS spokesperson Dinesh Agrawala said for the record, "It's not correct."</span>
[...]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Nevertheless TOI doesn't want to leave you high and dry with a named official source (other than the sloppy prosecutor) negating all the media outlet's unnamed "he said she said" claims. So they manufacture (well, what else are convenient characters without names) two more characters 'officers' to tell the required story - see the 2nd page at the TOI link above:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"Since he is a senior Army officer, he <b>could</b> be the source for the RDX, used in the bomb that went off in the textile town," said an officer. Police said that it had evidence that Purohit distributed money to several people through his organisation. "The financial transactions are through hawala as well," said an officer who is probing Purohit's hawala links.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The poster on Offstumped who posted the above TOI link remarked about the red bit (on this page):
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Mischief on part of the reporter and irresponsibility on part of TOI to first claim the confession without any credible proof.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->What an understatement. It's called Framed And Hanged By The Media.
The reporter of this TOI gossip column is predictably one Mateen Hafeez
At least one can go and look up ATS-related Mr Dinesh Agrawala and ask him whether he will confirm or deny what the TOI reported him as saying. We can't even do that much with these nameless 'officers' TOI has referred to (invented?). And is that really what they said, or would Dinesh Agrawala for ATS say TOI was wrong on this well???? One can't help asking.
And then, of course, comes the inevitable (link via Offstumped):
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Muslims_will_be_given_preference_in_police_jobs_Vilasrao/articleshow/3682507.cms
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Muslims will be given preference in police jobs: Vilasrao</b>
MUMBAI : <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Maharashtra Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh on Thursday assured Muslims that the Governmemnt would give them preference in police jobs.
</span>
<b>âA special officer from Muslim community would be appointed for the police recruitment</b> so that the community people can get more scope in the police department,â the Chief Minister said in the function of the Federation of All Minority Educational Organisation at Haj House here.
The Government has already appointed an officer from minority community on MPSC board which is helping to bring the community youth in the mainstream, he said.
Deshmukh also asked Muslim students to learn Marathi langauage along with Urdu. âOne should learn Marathi as it is the state language and also been used for the Government jobs,â he said.
<span style='color:red'>Deputy Chief Minister R R Patil who also attended the function said that Muslims should be given priority in private jobs also. Patil requested the Chief Minister that a meeting of private industrialists should be conducted in this regard.</span><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Raj Tacky and his goons will probably be too preoccupied killing Maharashtra's Hindus from other parts of India 'for speaking in Hindi' to care. After all isn't Tacky friends with these Congressis promising Urdu-speaking islamis preference in jobs in Shivaji's kingdom?
<b>More reading:</b>
http://offstumped.nationalinterest.in/2008...-not-vengeance/
I think people are making too much of it by assuming there is truth in all these accusations on Hindu Terrorism, when at this point we still know nothing of the sort. All we can see is that psecularists/christomedia are spinning one fabrication after another, and the higher ups actually had to get their conditioned/bribed policemen to <i>torture</i> a serviceman and a woman into confession.
From 2 posts up: even the police can't substantiate the claims (or rather, those the media <i>said</i> the police had made) with the army yet. Seems too much like cooked-up nonsense:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->as the jailed officer told the ATS team interrogating him, plot the Malegaon attack.
(Was that under duress of being beaten up by the 'police' as also happened in #17 above, just like millions of persons 'confessed' to witchery during the christo inquisitions)
This is now a matter of investigation <b>though army authorities here denied reports that they have received a fresh communication from ATS seeking permission to question peers of Purohit.</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Pretty much air still.
People don't even seem to agree on the basics, as also in bold above. Around the time ravish wrote "This is perhaps the first time that a High ranking Army Officer has been <i>arrested</i> for his alleged links with a terrorist organisation", the army seemed rather in disagreement, saying it was not arrest but detention for questioning:
http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/34166
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Nov 5
<b>Army denies arrest of Lt. Colonel Purohit in Malegaon blasts case</b>
[...]
"The officer is not under arrest. He has been accordingly detained by the ATS for the questioning. The Army Headquarters will take a further view on the matter based on progress of investigation by the ATS an availability of additional evidence, if any," said Veerendra Singh, APRO Army.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Meanwhile, an older article again shows how others tarred with the manufactured 'Hindu Terrorist' label deny their involvement. Yet again.
I have to wonder, where are their jihadi letters of self-gloating - after all, it's the Terrorist Way? Where is the call to Guerilla Warfare? Nowhere. No point in blowing up people without making demands. Islamaniacs make demands/issue gloats/threats all the time (though not always, certainly not when they want to blame others for their handiwork, but recall Osama bin What'sIt and his regular video releases).
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/search?upda...&max-results=20
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Military School denies training any "Hindu terrorists"</b>
links to http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=14785702 (excerpt moved from bottom in original to top)
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Tuesday, 28 October , 2008, 21:18
  <b>Nagpur: The Bhosla Military School has categorically denied imparting terrorist training to the Malegaon bomb blast accused or anyone else in the past, terming media reports to that effect as part of irresponsible and malicious propaganda.</b>
  âWe heard the names of the Malegaon bomb accused, including Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, for the first time when reports about their arrest appeared in the print and electronic media in the last some days," the school's Nagpur branch director Satish Salpekar said on Tuesday.
[...]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<b>Military School denies training any "Hindu terrorists"</b>
Of course, no such creatures exist - therefore they cannot possibly be "trained" in terror. The real terrorists in India are the Jihadis, the Christist evangelicals and their Maovadi lapdogs. Their genocidal terrorism is enabled by "SECULAR"
Stalinist politicians and the christist controlled Indian media.
The bogey of "Hindu terrorism" (sic)is merely the latest creation of the Pseudo-secular dirty tricks department. It is not even a brand new idea emerging from these windbags. The progenitor of the Nehruvian Stalinist cult in India himself had invented this mythology of "Hindu fascism" and attempted to muzzle Hindu nationalism by banning the RSS in the immediate aftermath of the partition.
A few thousand Hindu nationalists, Brahmins in particular were massacred and women dishonoured across Maharashtra by protagonists of "Gandhianism" (sic)in a state sponsored "SECULAR" pogrom unleashed by KKKaangress thugs using the "Mahatma's" (sic) slaying as an excuse. This, in fact was "independent" India's first act of genocide against Hindus - to be repeated in the 1984 genocide of Sikhs, again by the brutal Kaangress thugs.
Both Indira Ghandi and Narasimha Rao attempted to equate Hindu nationalism with real Islamist terror to appear even handed when forced to take the most limited action against Mohammedan separatists. Despite the cognitive dissonance endemic to dhimmi India, the disingenuous tactic of "fairness" never succeeded completely, because a small residue of common sense and ingrained historical memory does exist in the Indian people, that assists them in the precise identification of traitors and terrorists.
Accordingly, the alert citizen will need to make a couple of observations about the latest Goebbelsian disinformation campaign by the "SECULARS" :
1) Is the "government" not violating the human rights of Hindu nationalists
by placing them in indefinite illegal detention - without a shred of evidence to prove any culpability in "terrorism"? Does the concept of innocence until proven guilty simply not apply when Hindus are maliciously accused of wrongdoing? Isn't some draconian law being misused to persecute the MINORITY of Hindu nationalists?
2) Are the "government" and the media not deliberately injuring Hindu sentiment by repeatedly labeling innocent young people as "HINDU TERRORISTS"? Now, we are all aware of a "SECULAR" Indian convention; Indeed, it has been repeatedly drilled into us Ad Infinitum by the "SECULARS" that "TERRORISTS HAVE NO RELIGION".
Therefore, conceding the bogey of "terrorism" in this instance for argument's sake - is the "SECULAR" dictum not being violated by labeling individuals as "HINDU TERRORISTS"? Does this also not violate the "ALL RELIGIONS ARE EQUAL" rule? i.e. If all "religions" are equal, as the Dhimmis say - and Islam is a "Religion of Peace" and Christism is a "Religion of Love", then how can Hindus alone be qualified as "terrorists"? Hm mm, sounds like all religions are NOT equal after all for the "SECULARS".
3) OK, granted that Hindus do not deserve any human rights and are almost certainly "terrorists". Is yet another "SECULAR" law not being violated by totally obscuring the ROOT CAUSES of Hindu "terrorism"? How can the "government" and the tabloid Indian media minimise POVERTY and ILLITERACY as causative factors for misguiding some unemployed youth?
Pseudo Secularism is inconsistent, illogical and fatally flawed even in it's pathetic "balanced" attempt to equate Hindu nationalism with real Jihadi terrorism.
Posted by karyakarta92 at 10/28/2008 12:30:00 PM 0 comments <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
And another thing: Hindus could never take such <b><i>inept</i></b> action, targetting irrelevant individuals. The terrorist attacks they are accused of, have accomplished absolutely nothing: it hasn't carried out Afzal's death sentence, hasn't freed Kashmir from islamofascism, nor driven the islamaniac infiltrators from Bangladesh back across the border into the territory they had earlier stolen (BD), nor even made a point. (Not that terrorism can accomplish any of these things.)
And they've not owned up to it (see Sadhvi and Upadhyay who deny their involvement) - what kind of 'point' are they supposed to have been making, when they instead say they have had nothing to do with it? This army officer Purohit - as per the hyper dubious TOI, <i>even while being contradicted in this by the one ATS representative they are able to name</i> - supposedly has admitted to everything very conveniently, but then I don't think confessions extracted by torture (such as Sadhvi and Upadhyay have stated they were exposed to) count for anything.
Only the christo government, the christoislamaniacs and 'psecular' christomedia get something out of this: accusing Hindus of 'terrorism', at the cost of the lives of random (presumably 'minority') lives that only they would be willing to trade. Afzal's death is worth something to Hindus perhaps, but random citizens? It's tooooo ludicrous. Waiting with baited breath for the actual proof - where proof is not the sort of statements obtained by coercing the accused, of course.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Malegaon Blast Case - ATS Credibility not Hindutva on Trial</b>
4th update - There are now 4 contradictory versions on the origin of this transcript. CNN-IBN says its a tape, NDTV says its an eyewitness account of a phone conversation, Indian Express says its a hearsay account of conversation in a room in Ujjain where, apart from Ramji and the Sadhvi, a third person was [...]
<b>What came first - Transcript or the Eyewitness ?</b>
There are now 4 contradictory versions on the origin of the transcript produced in court in the Malegaon Blast Case.
CNN-IBN says its a tape,
NDTV says its an eyewitness account of a phone conversation,
Indian Express says its a hearsay account of conversation in a room in Ujjain where, apart from Ramji and the Sadhvi, a third [...]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Thereafter Offstumped did some stepping back when they heard the 'news' of the 'Grand Confession' of Purohit - see below. (Some commenters in Offstumped have reasonably supposed he may be a plant to drown the army - but perhaps he was merely tortured into confessing like two of the other accused, see post #17 above.)
I don't know if Offstumped remained at neutral even after the following ridiculous reporting by TOI was revealed - linked off a comment on the Offstumped page:
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Lt-Col_Purohit_admits_he_was_mastermind_of_Malegaon/articleshow/3683035.cms
<b>While TOI's piece is titled so definitely (or rather deceptively): "I was Malegaon mastermind, admits Lt-Col"</b>
And yet one reads:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->7 Nov 2008
[...]
It is learnt that Purohit, who was arrested on November 5, <b>admitted</b> to supplying the deadly RDX and weapons to members of the Abhinav Bharat, a radical Hindu outfit. Sources said the Mumbai's Anti-Terrorism Squad was planning to question another serving army officer in this connection whose name cropped up during Purohit's interrogation. <b>However, the confessional statement given to the police is not admissible in court.</b>
(Inadmissable? Why, because it came by way of torturing him?)
Sources said Purohit was conclusively cornered after he was confronted with telephone records that showed his links with another accused, retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay. "I am the mastermind of the blast. I arranged for the RDX and weapons but I can't understand how the weapons reached Abhinav Bharat members," sources quoted Purohit as telling police. Abhinav Bharat is the Hindu extremist group which wanted to avenge the terror attacks by Islamist groups. Several members of the group had links with other saffron outfits.
<span style='color:red'>While no anti-terrorism squad (ATS) officer was willing to comment on the reported confession, ATS spokesperson Dinesh Agrawala said for the record, "It's not correct."</span>
[...]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Nevertheless TOI doesn't want to leave you high and dry with a named official source (other than the sloppy prosecutor) negating all the media outlet's unnamed "he said she said" claims. So they manufacture (well, what else are convenient characters without names) two more characters 'officers' to tell the required story - see the 2nd page at the TOI link above:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"Since he is a senior Army officer, he <b>could</b> be the source for the RDX, used in the bomb that went off in the textile town," said an officer. Police said that it had evidence that Purohit distributed money to several people through his organisation. "The financial transactions are through hawala as well," said an officer who is probing Purohit's hawala links.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The poster on Offstumped who posted the above TOI link remarked about the red bit (on this page):
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Mischief on part of the reporter and irresponsibility on part of TOI to first claim the confession without any credible proof.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->What an understatement. It's called Framed And Hanged By The Media.
The reporter of this TOI gossip column is predictably one Mateen Hafeez
At least one can go and look up ATS-related Mr Dinesh Agrawala and ask him whether he will confirm or deny what the TOI reported him as saying. We can't even do that much with these nameless 'officers' TOI has referred to (invented?). And is that really what they said, or would Dinesh Agrawala for ATS say TOI was wrong on this well???? One can't help asking.
And then, of course, comes the inevitable (link via Offstumped):
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Muslims_will_be_given_preference_in_police_jobs_Vilasrao/articleshow/3682507.cms
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Muslims will be given preference in police jobs: Vilasrao</b>
MUMBAI : <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Maharashtra Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh on Thursday assured Muslims that the Governmemnt would give them preference in police jobs.
</span>
<b>âA special officer from Muslim community would be appointed for the police recruitment</b> so that the community people can get more scope in the police department,â the Chief Minister said in the function of the Federation of All Minority Educational Organisation at Haj House here.
The Government has already appointed an officer from minority community on MPSC board which is helping to bring the community youth in the mainstream, he said.
Deshmukh also asked Muslim students to learn Marathi langauage along with Urdu. âOne should learn Marathi as it is the state language and also been used for the Government jobs,â he said.
<span style='color:red'>Deputy Chief Minister R R Patil who also attended the function said that Muslims should be given priority in private jobs also. Patil requested the Chief Minister that a meeting of private industrialists should be conducted in this regard.</span><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Raj Tacky and his goons will probably be too preoccupied killing Maharashtra's Hindus from other parts of India 'for speaking in Hindi' to care. After all isn't Tacky friends with these Congressis promising Urdu-speaking islamis preference in jobs in Shivaji's kingdom?
<b>More reading:</b>
http://offstumped.nationalinterest.in/2008...-not-vengeance/
I think people are making too much of it by assuming there is truth in all these accusations on Hindu Terrorism, when at this point we still know nothing of the sort. All we can see is that psecularists/christomedia are spinning one fabrication after another, and the higher ups actually had to get their conditioned/bribed policemen to <i>torture</i> a serviceman and a woman into confession.
From 2 posts up: even the police can't substantiate the claims (or rather, those the media <i>said</i> the police had made) with the army yet. Seems too much like cooked-up nonsense:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->as the jailed officer told the ATS team interrogating him, plot the Malegaon attack.
(Was that under duress of being beaten up by the 'police' as also happened in #17 above, just like millions of persons 'confessed' to witchery during the christo inquisitions)
This is now a matter of investigation <b>though army authorities here denied reports that they have received a fresh communication from ATS seeking permission to question peers of Purohit.</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Pretty much air still.
People don't even seem to agree on the basics, as also in bold above. Around the time ravish wrote "This is perhaps the first time that a High ranking Army Officer has been <i>arrested</i> for his alleged links with a terrorist organisation", the army seemed rather in disagreement, saying it was not arrest but detention for questioning:
http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/34166
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Nov 5
<b>Army denies arrest of Lt. Colonel Purohit in Malegaon blasts case</b>
[...]
"The officer is not under arrest. He has been accordingly detained by the ATS for the questioning. The Army Headquarters will take a further view on the matter based on progress of investigation by the ATS an availability of additional evidence, if any," said Veerendra Singh, APRO Army.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Meanwhile, an older article again shows how others tarred with the manufactured 'Hindu Terrorist' label deny their involvement. Yet again.
I have to wonder, where are their jihadi letters of self-gloating - after all, it's the Terrorist Way? Where is the call to Guerilla Warfare? Nowhere. No point in blowing up people without making demands. Islamaniacs make demands/issue gloats/threats all the time (though not always, certainly not when they want to blame others for their handiwork, but recall Osama bin What'sIt and his regular video releases).
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/search?upda...&max-results=20
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Military School denies training any "Hindu terrorists"</b>
links to http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=14785702 (excerpt moved from bottom in original to top)
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Tuesday, 28 October , 2008, 21:18
  <b>Nagpur: The Bhosla Military School has categorically denied imparting terrorist training to the Malegaon bomb blast accused or anyone else in the past, terming media reports to that effect as part of irresponsible and malicious propaganda.</b>
  âWe heard the names of the Malegaon bomb accused, including Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, for the first time when reports about their arrest appeared in the print and electronic media in the last some days," the school's Nagpur branch director Satish Salpekar said on Tuesday.
[...]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<b>Military School denies training any "Hindu terrorists"</b>
Of course, no such creatures exist - therefore they cannot possibly be "trained" in terror. The real terrorists in India are the Jihadis, the Christist evangelicals and their Maovadi lapdogs. Their genocidal terrorism is enabled by "SECULAR"
Stalinist politicians and the christist controlled Indian media.
The bogey of "Hindu terrorism" (sic)is merely the latest creation of the Pseudo-secular dirty tricks department. It is not even a brand new idea emerging from these windbags. The progenitor of the Nehruvian Stalinist cult in India himself had invented this mythology of "Hindu fascism" and attempted to muzzle Hindu nationalism by banning the RSS in the immediate aftermath of the partition.
A few thousand Hindu nationalists, Brahmins in particular were massacred and women dishonoured across Maharashtra by protagonists of "Gandhianism" (sic)in a state sponsored "SECULAR" pogrom unleashed by KKKaangress thugs using the "Mahatma's" (sic) slaying as an excuse. This, in fact was "independent" India's first act of genocide against Hindus - to be repeated in the 1984 genocide of Sikhs, again by the brutal Kaangress thugs.
Both Indira Ghandi and Narasimha Rao attempted to equate Hindu nationalism with real Islamist terror to appear even handed when forced to take the most limited action against Mohammedan separatists. Despite the cognitive dissonance endemic to dhimmi India, the disingenuous tactic of "fairness" never succeeded completely, because a small residue of common sense and ingrained historical memory does exist in the Indian people, that assists them in the precise identification of traitors and terrorists.
Accordingly, the alert citizen will need to make a couple of observations about the latest Goebbelsian disinformation campaign by the "SECULARS" :
1) Is the "government" not violating the human rights of Hindu nationalists
by placing them in indefinite illegal detention - without a shred of evidence to prove any culpability in "terrorism"? Does the concept of innocence until proven guilty simply not apply when Hindus are maliciously accused of wrongdoing? Isn't some draconian law being misused to persecute the MINORITY of Hindu nationalists?
2) Are the "government" and the media not deliberately injuring Hindu sentiment by repeatedly labeling innocent young people as "HINDU TERRORISTS"? Now, we are all aware of a "SECULAR" Indian convention; Indeed, it has been repeatedly drilled into us Ad Infinitum by the "SECULARS" that "TERRORISTS HAVE NO RELIGION".
Therefore, conceding the bogey of "terrorism" in this instance for argument's sake - is the "SECULAR" dictum not being violated by labeling individuals as "HINDU TERRORISTS"? Does this also not violate the "ALL RELIGIONS ARE EQUAL" rule? i.e. If all "religions" are equal, as the Dhimmis say - and Islam is a "Religion of Peace" and Christism is a "Religion of Love", then how can Hindus alone be qualified as "terrorists"? Hm mm, sounds like all religions are NOT equal after all for the "SECULARS".
3) OK, granted that Hindus do not deserve any human rights and are almost certainly "terrorists". Is yet another "SECULAR" law not being violated by totally obscuring the ROOT CAUSES of Hindu "terrorism"? How can the "government" and the tabloid Indian media minimise POVERTY and ILLITERACY as causative factors for misguiding some unemployed youth?
Pseudo Secularism is inconsistent, illogical and fatally flawed even in it's pathetic "balanced" attempt to equate Hindu nationalism with real Jihadi terrorism.
Posted by karyakarta92 at 10/28/2008 12:30:00 PM 0 comments <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
And another thing: Hindus could never take such <b><i>inept</i></b> action, targetting irrelevant individuals. The terrorist attacks they are accused of, have accomplished absolutely nothing: it hasn't carried out Afzal's death sentence, hasn't freed Kashmir from islamofascism, nor driven the islamaniac infiltrators from Bangladesh back across the border into the territory they had earlier stolen (BD), nor even made a point. (Not that terrorism can accomplish any of these things.)
And they've not owned up to it (see Sadhvi and Upadhyay who deny their involvement) - what kind of 'point' are they supposed to have been making, when they instead say they have had nothing to do with it? This army officer Purohit - as per the hyper dubious TOI, <i>even while being contradicted in this by the one ATS representative they are able to name</i> - supposedly has admitted to everything very conveniently, but then I don't think confessions extracted by torture (such as Sadhvi and Upadhyay have stated they were exposed to) count for anything.
Only the christo government, the christoislamaniacs and 'psecular' christomedia get something out of this: accusing Hindus of 'terrorism', at the cost of the lives of random (presumably 'minority') lives that only they would be willing to trade. Afzal's death is worth something to Hindus perhaps, but random citizens? It's tooooo ludicrous. Waiting with baited breath for the actual proof - where proof is not the sort of statements obtained by coercing the accused, of course.