11-16-2008, 07:08 PM
Ravish,
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The author's grudge is understandable as he feels grave injustice was bestowed on him by the establishment.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What are you talking about? Did you even bother to read his article where he's stated that
<i><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I am proud to have been the first analyst to have drawn attention on October 2,2008, to the fact that the explosions of September 30 at Malegaon and Modasa in Gujarat did not gel with the explosions carried out in other parts of India by the jihadi terrorists. I was the first to have suggested that we should thoroughly investigate the suspected involvement of some Hindus in these blasts in order to gain the trust of the Muslim community and remove the misgivings in their mind about the fairness of the Police. I was the first to have suggested in a TV interview that if the Malegaon investigation warranted a re-visit to some of the past investigations into terrorist strikes in which Muslims were the main targets, the Police should not hesitate to do so.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
</i>
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->He could not reach the top of the organisation where he worked.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Do you know that Raman's even been called to US Congress/Senate to testify as expert despite his scathing criticism of US handling '93 blasts? He's done well for himself compared to thousands of yes-man babus out there.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--> So he brings out his frustration by writing such absurd articles, and gets mental peace.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Why don't you provide us with some mental peace by answering some absurdity raised my Shri Raman:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Can one think of any instance in the recent history of terrorism in which a terrorist-suspect created evidence against himself or herself by using his or her own vehicle for planting an improvised explosive device (IED)?...
(any answer for this one Ravish)
Very often, the speakers call for strong retaliatory attacks against the terrorist organisations, Pakistan and Bangladesh? Are they to be viewed as instigators of terrorism and are our training institutions to be criticised for holding such discussions?............
(pretty much entire India and all cabinet members can tagged as 'instigators of terrorism', right?)
rom their briefings, it appeared that incendiary devices and not explosive devices were used in the Samjotha Express. That was also the conclusion of many Western experts, including of STRATFOR, the well-known US analysis organisation. If the Delhi police knew at that time that RDX was used, did they try to find out the source of the explosive? If not, why not?.................
on the basis of the leaks from the Mumbai ATS--- is correct, then what the Delhi Police told the public in February,2007, was wrong and vice versa.........
(did Delhi police and STRATFOR police at Samjotha or they now retrofitting evidence to enable some predetermined conclusions?)
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The author's grudge is understandable as he feels grave injustice was bestowed on him by the establishment.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What are you talking about? Did you even bother to read his article where he's stated that
<i><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I am proud to have been the first analyst to have drawn attention on October 2,2008, to the fact that the explosions of September 30 at Malegaon and Modasa in Gujarat did not gel with the explosions carried out in other parts of India by the jihadi terrorists. I was the first to have suggested that we should thoroughly investigate the suspected involvement of some Hindus in these blasts in order to gain the trust of the Muslim community and remove the misgivings in their mind about the fairness of the Police. I was the first to have suggested in a TV interview that if the Malegaon investigation warranted a re-visit to some of the past investigations into terrorist strikes in which Muslims were the main targets, the Police should not hesitate to do so.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
</i>
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->He could not reach the top of the organisation where he worked.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Do you know that Raman's even been called to US Congress/Senate to testify as expert despite his scathing criticism of US handling '93 blasts? He's done well for himself compared to thousands of yes-man babus out there.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--> So he brings out his frustration by writing such absurd articles, and gets mental peace.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Why don't you provide us with some mental peace by answering some absurdity raised my Shri Raman:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Can one think of any instance in the recent history of terrorism in which a terrorist-suspect created evidence against himself or herself by using his or her own vehicle for planting an improvised explosive device (IED)?...
(any answer for this one Ravish)
Very often, the speakers call for strong retaliatory attacks against the terrorist organisations, Pakistan and Bangladesh? Are they to be viewed as instigators of terrorism and are our training institutions to be criticised for holding such discussions?............
(pretty much entire India and all cabinet members can tagged as 'instigators of terrorism', right?)
rom their briefings, it appeared that incendiary devices and not explosive devices were used in the Samjotha Express. That was also the conclusion of many Western experts, including of STRATFOR, the well-known US analysis organisation. If the Delhi police knew at that time that RDX was used, did they try to find out the source of the explosive? If not, why not?.................
on the basis of the leaks from the Mumbai ATS--- is correct, then what the Delhi Police told the public in February,2007, was wrong and vice versa.........
(did Delhi police and STRATFOR police at Samjotha or they now retrofitting evidence to enable some predetermined conclusions?)
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->