As you should understand Bodhi, I object to phrases about "humans biting dogs" on the grounds of self-interest/self-preservation <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Continued from post 166.
6. And one more thing on Alfred Dreyfus who was the victim of a terrorist anti-semitic (of course) conspiracy by the catholics of France who meant him to be the tip of the iceberg they wished to attack:
http://nobeliefs.com/Carroll.htm
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->BOOK REVIEW
<b>Â Â Constantine's Sword: The Church and the Jews
 Â
  by James Carroll</b>
  Houghton Mifflin Company, 2001
  576 pages, hardcover
 Â
  Review by Jim Walker
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Walker (an atheist or agnostic) writes that the <b>author of the book is "a devout Christian, indeed, an ex-Catholic priest".</b>
This book is about the anti-semitism in christianism - with particular focus on catholicism. Among its many chapters on anti-semitism=christianism, is:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->44. Alfred Dreyfus and La Croix<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->La Croix means the Cross.
The review by Jim Walker that also contains quotes from the book itself:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->This controversial book addresses mainly Catholics but it can inform anyone not familiar with the subterfuge of Catholicism. No doubt many Catholics will attack Carroll and will try to slander him. An intelligent reader will know otherwise.
[...]
<b>A few quotes from the book:</b>
German Christians remained attached to their religion during the Nazi years and that Nazi ideology borrowed heavily from Christian eschatology-- the subordination of the present to the expectation of a glorious End Time.
In Scripture class we were taught to distinguish between antisemitism and anti-Judaism, with the clear meaning that the latter was an appropriate part of the defense of the faith. Love the sinner but hate the sin.
<b>Support of Hitler was not only allowed to Catholics, but was required of them.</b>
It was at Nicaea... at the council enshrining the Christian victory, that Constantine, forbidding the observance of Easter at Passover time, declared, "It is unbecoming that on the holiest of festivals we should follow the customs of the Jews; henceforth let us have nothing in common with this odious people."
The philosopher Johann Fichte (1762-1814)... had posited a Jesus who was not Jewish at all, and throughout the century theologians followed suit. This would be one of the ways that German Protestant scholars tilled the soil for Nazi antisemitism, promulgating an idolatry of Aryan racial identity by defining Jesus over against Jewishness, not only religiously but racially. Eventually German Protestant hymnals would be "de-Judaized" by the removal of words like "amen," "hallelujah", and "hosanna."
Saint Ambrose, the greatest theologian of the age, would use the True Cross explicitly against the Jews, finally urging violence as the proper response to their denial of Christian claims.
It is important to emphasize that Luther's position on the Jews, however hateful it became, was grounded in the theological heart of Christian proclamation. "The basis of Luther's anti-Judaism," as the historian Heiko Oberman sums it up, "was the conviction that ever since Christ's appearance on earth, the Jews have had no more future as Jews."
<b>Blood purity regulations, Ruether asserts, "remained on the books in Catholic religious orders, such as the Jesuits, until the twentieth century. They are the ancestor of the Nazi Nuremberg Laws."</b>
(That is why the catholic nazis - I mean the catholic colonials who invaded India - also encouraged the preservation of 'caste' as among their converts in India: because they mistook this as something to do with blood purity. Casta=portuguese word.
That is also why the other christians - the Syrian christoterrorists - observe strict blood purity rules.
That is also why the protestant christians - the christotyrants from colonial Britain - were racist and consequently read racism into the Vedas and into the "caste" system, and invented their ode to blood purity (AIT).
Christianism <i>is</i> racism, which cannot see anything but racism everywhere else. It's a criminal that suspects everyone else of behaving like itself, and tries to accuse others in order to escape from its own crimes.)
Reality perceived as uncaused instances is reality of which no moral account can be made.
No Catholic-born Nazi-- not Goebbels, Himmler, or Bormann; not even Adolf Hitler, who died with his name still on the rolls of the Catholic Church, and for whom the Catholic primate of Germany ordered the Requiem sung after his suicide-- was ever excommunicated for being a Nazi. But, as Hans Kung observed, Pius XII "did not show the slightest inhibitions after the war, in 1949, about excommunicating all Communist members throughout the world at a stroke."
(That's because western communism <i>back then</i> had acted against christianism. But nazism had always acted *for* christianism - not only in the complete spirit of christianism, but also for the preservation and promotion of christianism and christiani principles.)
When Nazism defined Jews as the negative other, in opposition to which it defined itself, it was building on a structure of the European mind that was firmly in place before Hitler.
<b>Antisemitism was a consistently exploited organizing principle, a pillar of Protestant and Catholic identity.</b>
Pius XII's praise of German Catholic resistance [after the war] ignored the fact that such resistance was, as Lewy puts it, "not only discouraged by the Church, but condemned. Catholics who actively fought against the Hitler regime were rebels not only against the State, but against their ecclesiastical authorities as well."
The Church reveals an institution that has yet to come to terms with basic ideas like freedom of conscience and the dialectical nature of rational inquiry.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Christianism <i>is</i> fascism. It <i>is</i> anti-semitism. It <i>is</i> nazism. It <i>is</i> terrorism. These are all different names of christianism.
The reason I post this here is because there can NEVER be a discussion about the Alfred Dreyfus Affair without a mention of the catholic root cause (christian terrorism) behind it. It is wrong on the part of the DailyPioneer (and any who refer to the matter) to have avoided any mention of this in its article on the Dreyfus Affair. It is like a discussion on the Holocaust where christian nazism or the Jewish victims are omitted. <i>It simply cannot be.</i>
Avoiding the *crucial* facts amounts to contributing to a whitewashing of history. That is something christoislamicommunazis do. It is not something that Hindus should EVER do, regardless of whether it hurts the 'sentiments' of the christian readership of the Daily Pioneer. Truth will always hurt christoislamiterrorists. Who cares.
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo-->Continued from post 166.
6. And one more thing on Alfred Dreyfus who was the victim of a terrorist anti-semitic (of course) conspiracy by the catholics of France who meant him to be the tip of the iceberg they wished to attack:
http://nobeliefs.com/Carroll.htm
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->BOOK REVIEW
<b>Â Â Constantine's Sword: The Church and the Jews
 Â
  by James Carroll</b>
  Houghton Mifflin Company, 2001
  576 pages, hardcover
 Â
  Review by Jim Walker
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Walker (an atheist or agnostic) writes that the <b>author of the book is "a devout Christian, indeed, an ex-Catholic priest".</b>
This book is about the anti-semitism in christianism - with particular focus on catholicism. Among its many chapters on anti-semitism=christianism, is:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->44. Alfred Dreyfus and La Croix<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->La Croix means the Cross.
The review by Jim Walker that also contains quotes from the book itself:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->This controversial book addresses mainly Catholics but it can inform anyone not familiar with the subterfuge of Catholicism. No doubt many Catholics will attack Carroll and will try to slander him. An intelligent reader will know otherwise.
[...]
<b>A few quotes from the book:</b>
German Christians remained attached to their religion during the Nazi years and that Nazi ideology borrowed heavily from Christian eschatology-- the subordination of the present to the expectation of a glorious End Time.
In Scripture class we were taught to distinguish between antisemitism and anti-Judaism, with the clear meaning that the latter was an appropriate part of the defense of the faith. Love the sinner but hate the sin.
<b>Support of Hitler was not only allowed to Catholics, but was required of them.</b>
It was at Nicaea... at the council enshrining the Christian victory, that Constantine, forbidding the observance of Easter at Passover time, declared, "It is unbecoming that on the holiest of festivals we should follow the customs of the Jews; henceforth let us have nothing in common with this odious people."
The philosopher Johann Fichte (1762-1814)... had posited a Jesus who was not Jewish at all, and throughout the century theologians followed suit. This would be one of the ways that German Protestant scholars tilled the soil for Nazi antisemitism, promulgating an idolatry of Aryan racial identity by defining Jesus over against Jewishness, not only religiously but racially. Eventually German Protestant hymnals would be "de-Judaized" by the removal of words like "amen," "hallelujah", and "hosanna."
Saint Ambrose, the greatest theologian of the age, would use the True Cross explicitly against the Jews, finally urging violence as the proper response to their denial of Christian claims.
It is important to emphasize that Luther's position on the Jews, however hateful it became, was grounded in the theological heart of Christian proclamation. "The basis of Luther's anti-Judaism," as the historian Heiko Oberman sums it up, "was the conviction that ever since Christ's appearance on earth, the Jews have had no more future as Jews."
<b>Blood purity regulations, Ruether asserts, "remained on the books in Catholic religious orders, such as the Jesuits, until the twentieth century. They are the ancestor of the Nazi Nuremberg Laws."</b>
(That is why the catholic nazis - I mean the catholic colonials who invaded India - also encouraged the preservation of 'caste' as among their converts in India: because they mistook this as something to do with blood purity. Casta=portuguese word.
That is also why the other christians - the Syrian christoterrorists - observe strict blood purity rules.
That is also why the protestant christians - the christotyrants from colonial Britain - were racist and consequently read racism into the Vedas and into the "caste" system, and invented their ode to blood purity (AIT).
Christianism <i>is</i> racism, which cannot see anything but racism everywhere else. It's a criminal that suspects everyone else of behaving like itself, and tries to accuse others in order to escape from its own crimes.)
Reality perceived as uncaused instances is reality of which no moral account can be made.
No Catholic-born Nazi-- not Goebbels, Himmler, or Bormann; not even Adolf Hitler, who died with his name still on the rolls of the Catholic Church, and for whom the Catholic primate of Germany ordered the Requiem sung after his suicide-- was ever excommunicated for being a Nazi. But, as Hans Kung observed, Pius XII "did not show the slightest inhibitions after the war, in 1949, about excommunicating all Communist members throughout the world at a stroke."
(That's because western communism <i>back then</i> had acted against christianism. But nazism had always acted *for* christianism - not only in the complete spirit of christianism, but also for the preservation and promotion of christianism and christiani principles.)
When Nazism defined Jews as the negative other, in opposition to which it defined itself, it was building on a structure of the European mind that was firmly in place before Hitler.
<b>Antisemitism was a consistently exploited organizing principle, a pillar of Protestant and Catholic identity.</b>
Pius XII's praise of German Catholic resistance [after the war] ignored the fact that such resistance was, as Lewy puts it, "not only discouraged by the Church, but condemned. Catholics who actively fought against the Hitler regime were rebels not only against the State, but against their ecclesiastical authorities as well."
The Church reveals an institution that has yet to come to terms with basic ideas like freedom of conscience and the dialectical nature of rational inquiry.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Christianism <i>is</i> fascism. It <i>is</i> anti-semitism. It <i>is</i> nazism. It <i>is</i> terrorism. These are all different names of christianism.
The reason I post this here is because there can NEVER be a discussion about the Alfred Dreyfus Affair without a mention of the catholic root cause (christian terrorism) behind it. It is wrong on the part of the DailyPioneer (and any who refer to the matter) to have avoided any mention of this in its article on the Dreyfus Affair. It is like a discussion on the Holocaust where christian nazism or the Jewish victims are omitted. <i>It simply cannot be.</i>
Avoiding the *crucial* facts amounts to contributing to a whitewashing of history. That is something christoislamicommunazis do. It is not something that Hindus should EVER do, regardless of whether it hurts the 'sentiments' of the christian readership of the Daily Pioneer. Truth will always hurt christoislamiterrorists. Who cares.
Death to traitors.