<!--QuoteBegin-Mudy+Nov 28 2008, 04:51 AM-->QUOTE(Mudy @ Nov 28 2008, 04:51 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Wages of politics of cynicism</b>
pioneer.com
Balbir K Punj
Let us review the brief history of âHindu terrorâ. Mr Sharad Pawar, a senior member of the Union Cabinet, alleged on October 5, 2008, that there were âdouble standardsâ in police action against terror: âMuslims were being targeted as terrorists but no action was being taken against âHindu terrorâ groups. Mr Pawarâs statement had come in the wake of the Malegaon bombing of September 29. How did Mr Pawar know the identity of those responsible for Malegaon terror strike even before the investigations had concluded is something that remains a mystery.
Obviously the investigations now followed the lead given by the Central Minister. <b>The job of the ATS was easy. All it had to do was cook up âevidenceâ on the lines indicated by the powers that be. The âevidenceâ may not have been sufficient to stand court scrutiny but selective leaks to the media, on a daily basis, were enough to generate confusion and create the myth of âHindu terrorâ. It was vindication for those who fervently desired the discovery of such a phenomenon for their own vested interests.</b>
Mr Pawar was not being original in floating this devious theory. Prior to the 2007 Gujarat Assembly elections, Ms <span style='color:red'>Sonia Gandhi had used the description âmaut ka saudagarâ for Mr Narendra Modi.</span> <b>Mr Digvijay Singh, the Congress general secretary, has frequently harped on the theme of âHindu terrorâ.</b>
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->[right][snapback]90894[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Creating the perception has long been in the planning. They all took their cue from their christian queen, who was no doubt told by gawdly inspiration/the vatican fatcat on how best to apply jesuitry in their attempts to undermine Hindu Dharma.
pioneer.com
Balbir K Punj
Let us review the brief history of âHindu terrorâ. Mr Sharad Pawar, a senior member of the Union Cabinet, alleged on October 5, 2008, that there were âdouble standardsâ in police action against terror: âMuslims were being targeted as terrorists but no action was being taken against âHindu terrorâ groups. Mr Pawarâs statement had come in the wake of the Malegaon bombing of September 29. How did Mr Pawar know the identity of those responsible for Malegaon terror strike even before the investigations had concluded is something that remains a mystery.
Obviously the investigations now followed the lead given by the Central Minister. <b>The job of the ATS was easy. All it had to do was cook up âevidenceâ on the lines indicated by the powers that be. The âevidenceâ may not have been sufficient to stand court scrutiny but selective leaks to the media, on a daily basis, were enough to generate confusion and create the myth of âHindu terrorâ. It was vindication for those who fervently desired the discovery of such a phenomenon for their own vested interests.</b>
Mr Pawar was not being original in floating this devious theory. Prior to the 2007 Gujarat Assembly elections, Ms <span style='color:red'>Sonia Gandhi had used the description âmaut ka saudagarâ for Mr Narendra Modi.</span> <b>Mr Digvijay Singh, the Congress general secretary, has frequently harped on the theme of âHindu terrorâ.</b>
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->[right][snapback]90894[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Creating the perception has long been in the planning. They all took their cue from their christian queen, who was no doubt told by gawdly inspiration/the vatican fatcat on how best to apply jesuitry in their attempts to undermine Hindu Dharma.