<!--QuoteBegin-G.Subramaniam+Aug 31 2009, 01:37 AM-->QUOTE(G.Subramaniam @ Aug 31 2009, 01:37 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->But there are also less-pleasant truths about India's victory over HIV. Beyond literacy, condoms, blunt ads and brilliant bureaucrats, one thing more than any other has checked the spread of the virus here: the oppression of Indian women.[right][snapback]100787[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Oh yeah. For millennia the Dharmic women of the subcontinent must have been oppressed and *that* must be why most of them didn't bother to get more than one partner.
In reality, it is christian society - until the recent "emancipatory" revolution in the west (which brought new chains as all revolutions do) - that has ever been oppressive and controlling of its women. The christoterrorist author is merely projecting christian guilt onto heathen society in order to transfer christianism's own crimes.
The christo's logic is explained further here:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The extreme control exerted over women's personal lives â first by their parents, then by their husbands and in-laws â means that very few ever have the opportunity to have a sexual partner other than their husbands.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It's the monotheistic tendency of the christo(conditioned) again. The writer obviously <i>can't possibly imagine</i> - hence can't possibly allow - that maybe most Dharmic women actually *prefer* having only one sexual partner. Maybe... maybe... by far most of them are just happy with their heathen husbands. (And this is <i>exactly</i> why the christo can't allow for the fact that Hindu women committed Sati voluntarily because they were so devoted to their husbands they didn't want to outlive them. And once again, lying christianism slandered about how it would be Hindu society/Hindu males who must have forced those women to commit Sati. <- See? Same old <i>christo</i>logic. It's the same formula, same equation, same answer to be derived - to stake the heathen with the christian cross - except that the values for the variables have changed: now the crime is not Sati, it's chastity. But the criminal blamed for it is the same: Dharmic tradition hence Dharmic Society.)
But gasp! Such an explanation would be like ... like ... like the end of the world, man. So that couldn't <i>possibly</i> be it - that the heathen Dharmic women are generally rather contented with the monogamous state. Nah. It must be because they are always actively prevented by their evil dads, husbands, brothers, sons, male neighbours, male pets, male cows, male horses, male elephants, male Gods. And their male mothers, their male sisters, and the male part of the brain ( <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo--> ) of the women in question too. Yeah. That must be it. All these male entities conspired to keep the Dharmic women to only one partner. It was <i>a conspiracy of concerted oppression.</i>
Except for a small glitch in the christologic: that in many N American Native American communities (I'm afraid to generalise to "all", but certainly all the ones I've read of), the women also tended to have only 1 sexual partner (oh you're all so telepathic, right on! It <i>is</i> the husband). Unless the women lost their husbands.
And NA Native American society was not at all oppressive of its women as testimonies by christowesterns themselves have to confess, but rather "egalitarian" (i.e. egalitarian minus the connotations of doublespeak).
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Where 25 per cent of men report more than one sexual partner, less than 2 per cent of women do.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Really? So where's the hard data to support that 1/4 of Indian men have more than 1 sexual partner. Else it's all just claims. Sounds like the usual sort of christo-stats - you know, like the "99% of atheists are immoral".
(Or it may be that the christoislamic males have been expressly taken into account in order to pin heathens with christoislamic statistics as well: Indian christoislamis would be skewing the figures too, what with 4 wives to many an islamic male + a harem of kaffiri women for some, and then there's a church conclave of christian priests interacting with their nuns.)
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Where 25 per cent of men report more than one sexual partner, less than 2 per cent of women do. Married women get infected by their husbands, and sometimes pass HIV to their children, but the virus stops there: They do not have other partners to pass HIV on to.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->By his non-existence jeebus! What a crime! Let's burn the women, shall we, for not infecting more people with HIV. Come on, we're all good christians here. Burn burn burn them heathen women. Burn Zem! Jeebus Volt!
Hey, why aren't you moving. It's only heathens who don't burn their wimmen. What? What are you saying there are no christians here? You're all <i>still heathen</i>? How dare you. Evil bunch. Die! And roast in eternal flames! That will teach you to avoid AIDS by means of ... of... voluntary - nah - it must be self-<i>imposed</i> "chastity". Yes, that's it. You are all self-oppressed! (New psychological term for ya.) You brainwashed yourself - a mass self-delusion caused by Dharmic/heathen tradition - into being happy with your spouses. Evil heathens. Die! (etc. Rinse repeat.)
G Sub wrote:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The author is lamenting that most married Indian women are not whores<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->G Sub is way too kind in explaining the christo-author's motivations. But the christian terrorist is saying more than that. (And yes, it IS christian - note it bringing up "caste" and "Indoo men oppressing women" and doing their best to set up Africa against India on a matter where the two regions are not remotely in dispute: that AIDS needs to be tackled. This is a perfect example of the psychology behind christo-western 'social studies': even a health issue like AIDS can't be addressed objectively. All kinds of subjective nonsense - and expressed with quantities of bile in typical christian fashion - has to be brought in)
Anyway, the christian terrorist is actually lamenting that it is such a great pity that the Dharmic women aren't more promiscuous <i>so that then they could have helped in spreading the AIDS virus faster</i>. Repeat:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->(Christoterrorist
Married women get infected by their husbands, and sometimes pass HIV to their children, but the virus stops there: They do not have other partners to pass HIV on to.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Note that even this statement is a swipe against Dharmic society: the christian terrorist - the Look At Me, I'm oh-so-compassionate-to-women christian - is willing to sacrifice Indian women by promoting AIDS through insisting on increased female promiscuity, all for the sake of destroying Dharmic society for jeebus christ (turning Dharmic society on itself by co-opting Hindu women to strike at the Hindu male).
Such reasoning is typically christian, since
EVERYTHING the heathen does is considered bad to the christoterrorists.
If the heathens die too fast from AIDS, then the African heathens are to blame: "it must be the African heathens who are hyper promiscuous, since christians of course would never be - and if they were, then it must be them Africans' fault for being 'black', since christianism has of course established how black is hamitic/cursed and hence evil and promiscuous by nature".
If the heathens aren't dying fast enough then the Indian heathens are to blame: "the oppressive heathenism is keeping their population - in particular the females - too chaste and is impeding christianism, I mean AIDS."
Again: *everything* the heathen is does considered bad for christoterrorism.
Because anything that
- preserves heathenism (by adherence to heathen principles like self-regulation and making choices in life <i>consciously</i>) and
- anything that preserves heathen lives (like heathen women - and men - not passing around AIDS)
is seen as being against gawd. That is why the frustrated christianism causes such articles to be written. Since they won't accept jeebus, why won't they just die damn it?
The christian writer sounds very constipated by the fact that heathens are still Alive and Kicking.
IMO, the response is simple: Yes, still here. Nya-nya-nya-nya-nyaaah.
In reality, it is christian society - until the recent "emancipatory" revolution in the west (which brought new chains as all revolutions do) - that has ever been oppressive and controlling of its women. The christoterrorist author is merely projecting christian guilt onto heathen society in order to transfer christianism's own crimes.
The christo's logic is explained further here:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The extreme control exerted over women's personal lives â first by their parents, then by their husbands and in-laws â means that very few ever have the opportunity to have a sexual partner other than their husbands.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It's the monotheistic tendency of the christo(conditioned) again. The writer obviously <i>can't possibly imagine</i> - hence can't possibly allow - that maybe most Dharmic women actually *prefer* having only one sexual partner. Maybe... maybe... by far most of them are just happy with their heathen husbands. (And this is <i>exactly</i> why the christo can't allow for the fact that Hindu women committed Sati voluntarily because they were so devoted to their husbands they didn't want to outlive them. And once again, lying christianism slandered about how it would be Hindu society/Hindu males who must have forced those women to commit Sati. <- See? Same old <i>christo</i>logic. It's the same formula, same equation, same answer to be derived - to stake the heathen with the christian cross - except that the values for the variables have changed: now the crime is not Sati, it's chastity. But the criminal blamed for it is the same: Dharmic tradition hence Dharmic Society.)
But gasp! Such an explanation would be like ... like ... like the end of the world, man. So that couldn't <i>possibly</i> be it - that the heathen Dharmic women are generally rather contented with the monogamous state. Nah. It must be because they are always actively prevented by their evil dads, husbands, brothers, sons, male neighbours, male pets, male cows, male horses, male elephants, male Gods. And their male mothers, their male sisters, and the male part of the brain ( <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo--> ) of the women in question too. Yeah. That must be it. All these male entities conspired to keep the Dharmic women to only one partner. It was <i>a conspiracy of concerted oppression.</i>
Except for a small glitch in the christologic: that in many N American Native American communities (I'm afraid to generalise to "all", but certainly all the ones I've read of), the women also tended to have only 1 sexual partner (oh you're all so telepathic, right on! It <i>is</i> the husband). Unless the women lost their husbands.
And NA Native American society was not at all oppressive of its women as testimonies by christowesterns themselves have to confess, but rather "egalitarian" (i.e. egalitarian minus the connotations of doublespeak).
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Where 25 per cent of men report more than one sexual partner, less than 2 per cent of women do.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Really? So where's the hard data to support that 1/4 of Indian men have more than 1 sexual partner. Else it's all just claims. Sounds like the usual sort of christo-stats - you know, like the "99% of atheists are immoral".
(Or it may be that the christoislamic males have been expressly taken into account in order to pin heathens with christoislamic statistics as well: Indian christoislamis would be skewing the figures too, what with 4 wives to many an islamic male + a harem of kaffiri women for some, and then there's a church conclave of christian priests interacting with their nuns.)
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Where 25 per cent of men report more than one sexual partner, less than 2 per cent of women do. Married women get infected by their husbands, and sometimes pass HIV to their children, but the virus stops there: They do not have other partners to pass HIV on to.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->By his non-existence jeebus! What a crime! Let's burn the women, shall we, for not infecting more people with HIV. Come on, we're all good christians here. Burn burn burn them heathen women. Burn Zem! Jeebus Volt!
Hey, why aren't you moving. It's only heathens who don't burn their wimmen. What? What are you saying there are no christians here? You're all <i>still heathen</i>? How dare you. Evil bunch. Die! And roast in eternal flames! That will teach you to avoid AIDS by means of ... of... voluntary - nah - it must be self-<i>imposed</i> "chastity". Yes, that's it. You are all self-oppressed! (New psychological term for ya.) You brainwashed yourself - a mass self-delusion caused by Dharmic/heathen tradition - into being happy with your spouses. Evil heathens. Die! (etc. Rinse repeat.)
G Sub wrote:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The author is lamenting that most married Indian women are not whores<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->G Sub is way too kind in explaining the christo-author's motivations. But the christian terrorist is saying more than that. (And yes, it IS christian - note it bringing up "caste" and "Indoo men oppressing women" and doing their best to set up Africa against India on a matter where the two regions are not remotely in dispute: that AIDS needs to be tackled. This is a perfect example of the psychology behind christo-western 'social studies': even a health issue like AIDS can't be addressed objectively. All kinds of subjective nonsense - and expressed with quantities of bile in typical christian fashion - has to be brought in)
Anyway, the christian terrorist is actually lamenting that it is such a great pity that the Dharmic women aren't more promiscuous <i>so that then they could have helped in spreading the AIDS virus faster</i>. Repeat:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->(Christoterrorist
Married women get infected by their husbands, and sometimes pass HIV to their children, but the virus stops there: They do not have other partners to pass HIV on to.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Note that even this statement is a swipe against Dharmic society: the christian terrorist - the Look At Me, I'm oh-so-compassionate-to-women christian - is willing to sacrifice Indian women by promoting AIDS through insisting on increased female promiscuity, all for the sake of destroying Dharmic society for jeebus christ (turning Dharmic society on itself by co-opting Hindu women to strike at the Hindu male).
Such reasoning is typically christian, since
EVERYTHING the heathen does is considered bad to the christoterrorists.
If the heathens die too fast from AIDS, then the African heathens are to blame: "it must be the African heathens who are hyper promiscuous, since christians of course would never be - and if they were, then it must be them Africans' fault for being 'black', since christianism has of course established how black is hamitic/cursed and hence evil and promiscuous by nature".
If the heathens aren't dying fast enough then the Indian heathens are to blame: "the oppressive heathenism is keeping their population - in particular the females - too chaste and is impeding christianism, I mean AIDS."
Again: *everything* the heathen is does considered bad for christoterrorism.
Because anything that
- preserves heathenism (by adherence to heathen principles like self-regulation and making choices in life <i>consciously</i>) and
- anything that preserves heathen lives (like heathen women - and men - not passing around AIDS)
is seen as being against gawd. That is why the frustrated christianism causes such articles to be written. Since they won't accept jeebus, why won't they just die damn it?
The christian writer sounds very constipated by the fact that heathens are still Alive and Kicking.
IMO, the response is simple: Yes, still here. Nya-nya-nya-nya-nyaaah.