• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Cure For Terrorism Is Virat Brihad Hindutva
[url="http://janamejayan.wordpress.com/2011/02/09/upa-govt-should-provide-fullest-security-cover-for-dr-subramanian-swamy/"][color="#FF0000"][size="5"]UPA Govt. should provide fullest security cover for Dr. Subramanian Swamy[/size][/color][/url]
Listen to Dr.Swamy's powerful plea to the Muslims addressing them right in their midst.

This is a great video. The moderator had to beg the people to ask questions to other panelists as well, as no one was interested to do so. The exchange between Dr. Swamy & Farook Abdullah in the end is interesting. It is amusing to see the "secular apologists" (sic!) go about dancing around the subject while Dr. Swamy shoots straight.

[url="http://vimeo.com/21342400"]India Today Conclave[/url]
Secularism is the anti-thesis of our four-fold objectives of Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha. A clearer description of this much touted 'Secularism' is found in a commentary to an article that appeared in the student online newspaper of Clark University.

[url="http://janamejayan.wordpress.com/2011/04/03/what-does-the-arab-world-really-want/"]What does the Arab World really want?[/url]

April 3, 2011 by janamejayan

The students of Clark University posed this question and posted it on their online newspaper. See http://clarknews.wordpress.com/2011/04/0.../#comments

I posted my comments as follows:

I would like to put in my thoughts that I believe would clarify the question posed in this article viz. “What does the Arab World really want?”

First of all, there is clearly stated in so many words in this article a puzzling question as to “what the western world want to do in Libya, more particularly what the U.S. want?”

So let’s start from the basics.

The western world are the champions of capitalism and free trade by which they wish to ‘immigrate’ and ‘emigrate’ capital in and out of various countries with the sole objective of making a huge profit that will not stay in those countries but siphoned off in safe havens.

Capitalists have no nationality in this pursuit of making money and stashing it in safe haven.

They are actually fishermen of human wealth whose capital is nothing but a bait in the harvesting of human wealth world over. Therefore these fishermen who are euphemistically called ‘capitalists’ have undergone one transformation since the days of mercantile capitalism and that tranformation is the change from colonialism to neo-colonialism ie. the integration of ‘foreign’ and ‘native’ capitalists as partners in crime.

Secularism is the converting of the people into ‘workers’ and hijacking their wealth over to a safe haven. Such workers too become a ‘capital’ and they are moved in and out of their native land just as a chattel. So people world over under capitalism are deprived of their love of land, culture, religion and other individual pursuits though the global capitalists mouth bombastic ideals such as humanism, freedom, democracy etc. as the hallmarks of of one heinous pursuit of converting man into machine. No country is an exception in this process of wealth harvesting of human labour of every nation. So capitalism has to be understood as a ‘highway’ that leads the global wealth born out of human labour to be stashed away. Nations are exhorted to knit themselves into this highway by a unique appeal to ‘democracy’, freedom, human rights all of which go into one nomenclature called SECULARISM. This highway started when the capitalists then known as ‘mercantile’ capitalists broke the borders of thier own countries in Europe and barged into countries across the globe breaking the sanctity of these nations in respect of their sovereignty, their religion, their economy, their culture and their unique ways of life.

The so called ideals of Marxism with its socialism and communism unfortunately sits on this very basic premise of converting man into machine and therefore it is no way different from the essentials of capitalism.

I have given a very precise definition of global capitalism that can be written about in volumes after volumes. Yet this precise definition would suffice to carry on with our discussion.

Most Arab countries are deserts but are rich in oil because of a hydro carbon shower from outer space millions of years ago. And this oil makes them important, otherwise no one will care for these deserts or the nomads who occupy them. The rulers of these nations are essentially despots nurtured to be so by the international capitalism so these despots can keep the natives under control by appealing to islam that essentially teaches obedience which forbids criticism of the religion, by distribution of a fraction of wealth that keeps these natives as docile consumers wasting away their life dreaming of the Islamic heaven.

The oil is the only reason that these desert lands are knit into the global highway otherwise no road will lead to these places. Having despotic rulers is a precondition in the harvesting of the oil wealth. So please understand the dilemma of the global capitalist when he sees revolt in the Arab world. Do you really think that the western world is interested if the natives rebel against despots? Therefore the global capitalist would not support any change that would not reproduce a pliable despot at the end who would remove obstruction to the free flow of wealth namely the oil out of these countries. So whenever there is a revolt within the Arab countries the global capitalist would intervene and tire out the warring factions with a view to bringing about the pliable despot at the end!

Remember this will continue to be the consideration in the global capitalists’ opposition to Iran since the day the mullahs overthrew the Shah.
[url="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/80915291/HINDUTVA_PRINCIPLES_FOR_ECONOMIC_DEVELOPMENT%5B1%5D"][color="#FF8C00"][size="5"]Hindutva principles for economic developmen​t: Dr. Subramania​n Swamy[/size][/color][/url]
[color="#FF0000"][size="6"]How to wipe out Islamic terror: Dr. Subramanian Swamy[/size][/color]

The ‘minority’ commission is trying to use the secular law to thwart the fundamental rights of the Indian citizens in expressing their fears of terrorist attacks by the Islamic hoards that are bent upon destroying Hindustan. We are republishing Dr.Subramanian Swamy’s article so you can judge it yourself. The saying is true that if one is not pro-Indian then he is anti-Indian. If one is not pro-Hindu then he is anti-Hindu. Most secularists fall in this category.


[url="http://janamejayan.wordpress.com/2011/07/29/how-to-wipe-out-islamic-terror- by dr-subramaniam-swamy/"]How to wipe out Islamic terror: by Dr. Subramaniam Swamy[/url]

The terrorist blast in Mumbai on July 13, 2011 requires a decisive soul searching by Hindus of India. Hindus cannot accept to be killed in this Halal fashion, continuously bleeding every day, till the nation finally collapses.

Terrorism, I define here as the illegal use of force to overawe the civilian population to make it do or not do an act against their will and well-being.

There are about 40 reported and unreported terrorist attacks per month in the country. That is why the recent US National Counter-Terrorism Centre publication A Chronology of International Terrorism states: ‘India suffered more terrorist acts than any other country’.

While the PM thinks that Maoists’ threat is most serious, I think Islamic terrorism is an even more serious existential threat. If we did not have today the present Union Home Minister, PM, and UPA chairperson, then Maoists can be eliminated in a month, much as I did with the LTTE in Tamil Nadu, as a senior minister in 1991, or MGR did with the Naxalites in the early 1980s. Islamic threat to the nation is different.

Why is Islamic terrorism our number one problem of national security? About this there will be no doubt in anyone’s mind after 2012. By that year, I expect a Taliban takeover in Pakistan and the Americans to flee Afghanistan. Then, Islam will confront Hinduism to ‘complete unfinished business’. Already the successor to Osama Bin Laden as the Al Qaeda leader has declared that India is the priority target for that terrorist organisation and not the USA.

Fanatic Muslims consider Hindu dominated India as “an unfinished chapter of Islamic conquests”. I may be recalled that all other countries conquered by Islam became 100% converted to Islam within two decades of the Islamic invasion. India is the exception. Undivided India in 1947 was 75% Hindu even after 800 years of brutal Islamic rule. That is jarring for the Islamic fanatics.

Let us remember that every Hindu-Muslim riot in India since 1947, has been ignited by Muslim fanatics — if one goes by all the Commissions of Inquiry set up after every riot. Even the Gujarat riots were triggered by the brutal killing of 56 women and children by setting fire to a rail coach in Godhra.

By today’s definition these riots are all terroristacts. Muslims, though a minority in India, still have fanatics who dare tolead violent attacks against Hindus. Other Muslims of India just lump it, sulk or rejoice. That is the history from Babar’s time to Aurangzeb. There have been exceptions to this apathy of Muslims like Dara Shikoh, in the old days, or like M J Akbar and Salman Haidar today who are not afraid to speak out against Islamic terror, but still they remain exceptions.

Blame the Hindus

In one sense, I do not blame the Muslim fanatics for targeting Hindus. I blame us Hindus who have taken their individuality permitted in Sanatana Dharma to the extreme. Millions of Hindus can assemble without state patronage for Kumbh Mela completely self-organised, but they all leave for home oblivious of the targeting of Hindus in Kashmir, Mau, Melvisharam and Malappuram and do not lift their little finger to help organise Hindus. For example, if half the Hindus vote together rising above their caste and language, a genuine Hindu party will have a two-thirds majority in Parliament and Assemblies.

The secularists now tout instances of Hindu fanatics committing terrorist attacks against Muslims or other minorities. But these attacks are mostly state sponsored, often by the Congress itself, and not by Hindu ‘non-state actors’. Muslim-led attacks are however all by ‘non-state actors’ unless one includes the ISI and rogue elements in Pakistan’s army which are aiding them, as state sponsoring.

Fanatic Muslim attacks have been carried out to target and demoralise the Hindus, to make Hindus yield that which they should not, with the aim of undermining and ultimately to dismantle the Hindu foundation of India. This is the unfinished war of 1,000 years which Osama bin Laden talks about. In fact, the earliest terror tactics in India were deployed in Bengal 1946 by Suhrawady and Jinnah to terrorise Hindus to give in on the demand for Pakistan. The Congress party claiming to represent the Hindus capitulated, and handed 25 per cent of India on a platter to Mohammed Ali Jinnah. Now they want the remaining 75 per cent.

Forces against Hindus

This is not to say that other stooges have not targeted Hindus. During the last six decades since Independence, British imperialist-inspired Dravidian movement led by E V Ramaswamy Naicker, in the name of rationalism tried to debunk as irrational the Hindu religion, and terrorised the Hindu priestly class, ie, the Brahmins, for propagating the Hindu religion.

The movement’s organisational arm, the Dravida Kazhagam (DK), had venerated Ravana for 50 years to spite the Hindu adoration of Rama and vulgarise the abduction of Sita, till the DK belatedly learnt that Ravana was a Brahmin and a pious bhakta of Lord Shiva too. Abandoning this course of defaming Ramayana, the DK have now become stooges of the anti-Indian LTTE which has specialised in killing the Hindu Tamil leadership in Sri Lanka. Of course the DK has now been orphaned by the decimation of the LTTE.

Civil war situation

In the 1960s, the Christian missionaries had inspired the Nagas. The Nagas also wanted to further amputate Bharat Mata by seeking secession of Nagaland from the nation. In the 1980s, the Hindus of Manipur were targeted by foreign-trained elements. Manipuris were told:give up Hinduism or be killed. In Kashmir, since the beginning of the 1990s, militants in league with the Pakistan-trained terrorists also targeted the Hindus by driving the Hindu Pandits out of the Valley, or killing them ordishonouring their women folk.

Recognising that targeting of Hindus is being widely perceived, and that Muslims of India are largely just passive spectators, the foreign patrons of Islamic terrorists are beginning to engage in terrorist acts that could pit Muslims against Hindus in nation-wide conflagration and possible civil war as in Serbia and Bosnia.

Muslims cannot be divided into ‘moderates’ and ‘extremists’ because the former just capitulate when confronted. Recently, Pakistan civilian government capitulated on ‘kite flying’ and banned it because Taliban considers it as ‘Hindu’. Moderate governments of Malaysia and Kazhakstan are now demolishing Hindu temples.

Collective response

Hence, the first lesson to be learnt from recent history of Islamic terrorism against India, and for tackling terrorism in India is that the Hindu is the target and that Muslims of India are being programmed by a slow reactive process to become radical and thus slide into suicide against Hindus. It is to undermine the Hindu psyche and create fear of civil war that terror attacks are organised.

And hence since the Hindu is the target, Hindus must collectively respond as Hindus against the terrorist and not feel individually isolated or worse, be complacent because he or she is not personally affected. If one Hindu dies merely because he or she was a Hindu, then a bit of every Hindu also dies. This is an essential mental attitude, a necessary part of a virat Hindu (for fuller discussion of the concept of virat Hindu, see my Hindus Under Siege: The Way Out Haranand, 2006).

Therefore we need today a collective mindset as Hindus to stand against the Islamic terrorist. In this response, Muslims of India can join us if they genuinely feel for the Hindu. That they do, I will not believe, unless they acknowledge with pride that though they may be Muslims, their ancestors are Hindus.

It is not easy for them to acknowledge this ancestry because the Muslim mullah would consider it as unacceptable since that realisation would dilute the religious fervour in their faith and also create an option for their possible re-conversion to Hinduism. Hence, these religious leaders preach hatred and violence against the kafir i.e, the Hindu (for example read Chapter 8 verse 12 of the Quran) to keep the faith of their followers. The Islamic terrorist outfits, e.g the SIMI, has already resolved that India is Darul Harab, and they are committed to make it Darul Islam. That makes them free of any moral compunction whatsoever in dealing with Hindus.

Brihad Hindu Samaj

But still, if any Muslim does so acknowledge his or her Hindu legacy, then we Hindus can accept him or her as a part of the Brihad Hindu Samaj, which is Hindustan. India that is Bharat that is Hindustan is a nation of Hindus and others whose ancestors are Hindus. Even Parsis and Jews in India have Hindu ancestors. Others, who refuse to so acknowledge or those foreigners who become Indian citizens by registration can remain in India, but should not have voting rights (which means they cannot be elected representatives).

Hence, to begin with, any policy to combat terrorism must begin with requiring each and every Hindu becoming a committed or virat Hindu. To be a virat Hindu one must have a Hindu mindset, a mindset that recognises that there is vyaktigat charitra (personal character) and a rashtriya charitra (national character).

It is not enough if one is pious, honest and educated. That is the personal character only. National character is a mindset actively and vigorously committed to the sanctity and integrity of the nation. For example, Manmohan Singh, our prime minister, has high personal character (vyaktigat charitra), but by being a rubber stamp of a semi-literate Sonia Gandhi, and waffling on all national issues, he has proved that he has no rashtriya charitra.

The second lesson for combating the terrorism we face today is: since demoralising the Hindu and undermining the Hindu foundation of India in order to destroy the Hindu civilisation, is the goal of all terrorists in India we must never capitulate and never concede any demand of the terrorists. The basic policy has to be: never yield to any demand of the terrorists. That necessary resolve has not been shown in our recent history. Instead ever since we conceded Pakistan in 1947 under duress, we have been mostly yielding time and again.

Bowing to terrorists

In 1989, to obtain the release of Mufti Mohammed Sayeed’s daughter, Rubaiyya who had been kidnapped by terrorists, five terrorists in Indian jails were set free by the V P Singh’s government. This made these criminals in the eyes of Kashmiri separatists and fence sitters heroes, as those who had brought India’s Hindu establishment on its knees. To save Rubaiyya it was not necessary to surrender to terrorist demands.

A worse capitulation to terrorists in our modern history was in the Indian Airlines IC-814 hijack in December 1999 staged in Kandahar. The government released three terrorists even without getting court permission (required since they were in judicial custody). Moreover, they were escorted by a senior minister on the PM’s special Boeing all the way to Kandahar as royal guests instead of being shoved across the Indo-Pakistan border.

Worse still, all the three after being freed, went back to Pakistan and created three separate terrorist organisations to kill Hindus. Mohammed Azhar, whom the National Security Advisor Brijesh Mishra had then described as “a mere harmless cleric”, upon his release led the LeT to savage and repeated terrorist attacks on Hindus all over India from Bangalore to Srinagar. Since mid-2000, Azhar is responsible for the killing of over 2,000 Hindus and the attack on Parliament on December 13, 2001. Omar Sheikh who helped al-Qaeda is in jail in US custody for killing US journalist Daniel Pearl, while the third, Zargar is engaged today in random killings of Hindus in Doda and Jammu after founding Al-Mujahideen Jingaan.

This Kandahar episode proves that we should never negotiate with terrorists, never yield. If you do, then sooner or later you will end up losing more lives than you will ever save by a deal with terrorists.

Moment of truth

The third lesson to be learnt is that whatever and however small the terrorist incident, the nation must retaliate—not by measured and ‘sober’ responses but by massive retaliation. Otherwise what is the alternative? Walk meekly to death expecting that our ‘sober’ responses will be rewarded by our neighbours and their patrons? We will be back to 1100 AD fooled into suicidal credulity. We should not be ghouls for punishment from terrorists and their patrons. We should retaliate.

For example, when Ayodhya temple was sought to be attacked, this was not a big terrorist incident but we should have massively retaliated by re-building the Ram temple at the site.

This is Kaliyug, and hence there is no room for sattvic responses to evil people. Hindu religion has a concept of apat dharma and we should invoke it. This is the moment of truth for us. Either we organise to survive as a civilisation or vanish as the Persian, Babylonian, and Egyptian civilisations did centuries ago before the brutal Islamic onslaught. For that our motto should be Saam, Dhaam, Bheda, Danda.

Poverty is no factor

What motivates the Islamic terrorists in India? Many are advising us Hindus to deal with the root ‘cause’ of terrorism rather than concentrate on eradicating terrorists by retaliation. And pray what is the root ‘cause’?

According to bleeding heart liberals, terrorists are born or bred because of illiteracy, poverty, oppression, and discrimination. They argue that instead of eliminating them, the root cause of these four disabilities in society should be removed. Only then terrorism will disappear. Before replying to this, let us understand that I have serious doubts about the integrity of these liberals, or more appropriately, these promiscuous intellectuals. They seek to deaden the emotive power of the individual and render him passive (inculcate ‘majboori’ in our psyche). A nation state cannot survive for long with such a capitulationist mentality.

It is rubbish to say that terrorists who mastermind the attacks are poor. Osama bin laden for example is a billionaire. Islamic terrorists are patronised by those states that have grown rich from oil revenues. In Britain, the terrorists arrested so far for the bombings are all well-to-do persons. Nor are terrorists uneducated. Most of terrorist leaders are doctors, chartered accountants, MBAs and teachers. For example, in the failed Times Square New York episode, the Islamic terrorist Shahzad studied and got an MBA from a reputed US university. He was from a highly placed family in Pakistan. He certainly faced no discrimination and oppression in his own country. The gang of nine persons who hijacked four planes on September 11, 2001 and flew them into the World Trade Towers in New York and other targets were certainly not discriminated or oppressed in the United States. Hence it is utter rubbish to say that terror is the outcome of the poverty terrorists face.

If we accept the Left-wing liberals argument, does it mean that in Islamic countries, the non-Islamic religious minority who are discriminated and oppressed can take to terrorism? In the Valley, where Muslims are in majority, not only Article 370 of the Constitution provides privileges to the majority but it is the minority Hindus who have been slaughtered, or raped, and dispossessed. They have become refugees in squalid conditions in their own country.

It is also a ridiculous idea that terrorists cannot be deterred because they are irrational, willing to die, and have no ‘return address’. Terrorist masterminds have political goals and a method in their madness. An effective strategy to deter terrorism is therefore to defeat those political goals and to rubbish them by counter-terrorist action. How is that strategy to be structured? In a brilliant research paper published by Robert Trager and Dessislava Zagorcheva this year (‘Deterring Terrorism’ International Security, vol 30, No 3, Winter 2005/06, pp 87-123) has provided the general principles to structure such a strategy.


Applying these principles, I advocate the following strategy to negate the political goals of Islamic terrorism in India, provided the Muslim community fail to condemn these goals and call them un-Islamic:

Goal 1: Overawe India on Kashmir.

Strategy: Remove Article 370, and re-settle ex-servicemen in the Valley. Create Panun Kashmir for Hindu Pandit community. Look or create opportunity to take over PoK. If Pakistan continues to back terrorists, assist the Baluchis and Sindhis to struggle for independence.

Goal 2: Blast our temples and kill Hindu devotees.

Strategy: Remove the masjid in Kashi Vishwanath temple complex, and 300 others in other sites as a tit-for-tat.

Goal 3: Make India into Darul Islam.

Strategy: Implement Uniform Civil Code, make Sanskrit learning compulsory and singing of Vande Mataram mandatory, and declare India as Hindu Rashtra in which only those non-Hindus can vote if they proudly acknowledge that their ancestors are Hindus. Re-name India as Hindustan as a nation of Hindus and those whose ancestors are Hindus.

Goal 4: Change India’s demography by illegal immigration, conversion, and refusal to adopt family planning.

Strategy: Enact a national law prohibiting conversion from Hindu religion to any other religion. Re-conversion will not be banned. Declare caste is not birth-based but code of discipline based. Welcome non-Hindus to re-convert to the caste of their choice provided they adhere to the code of discipline. Annex land from Bangladesh in proportion to the illegal migrants from that country staying in India. At present, northern one-third from Sylhet to Khulna can be annexed to re-settle the illegal migrants.

Goal 5: Denigrate Hinduism through vulgar writings and preaching in mosques, madrassas, and churches to create loss of self-respect amongst Hindus and make them fit for capitulation.

Strategy: Propagate the development of a Hindu mindset (see my new book Hindutva and National Renaissance, Haranand, 2010).

India can solve its terrorist problem within five years by such a deterrent strategy, but for that we have to learn the four lessons outlined above, and have a Hindu mindset to take bold, risky, and hard decisions to defend the nation. If the Jews can be transformed from lambs walking meekly to the gas chambers to fiery lions in just 10 years, it is not difficult for Hindus in much better circumstances (after all we are 83 per cent of India), to do so in five years.

Guru Gobind Singh has shown us the way already, how just five fearless persons under spiritual guidance can transform a society. Even if half the Hindu voters are persuaded to collectively vote as Hindus, and for a party sincerely committed to a Hindu agenda, then we can forge an instrument for change. And that ultimately is the bottom line in the strategy to deter terrorism in a democratic Hindustan at this moment of truth.

About the author:

Subramanian Swamy* Janata Party President is a Professor of Economics and a former Union Cabinet Minister*
[url="http://www.vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplayArticle.aspx?id=1900"][color="#FF00FF"][size="5"]FBI-ISI-Fai and the UPA[/size][/color][/url]

Sandhya Jain

02 Aug 2011

America’s startling political decision to arrest US citizen cum ISI lobbyist Ghulam Nabi Fai last month, while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was in India, follows a string of continuing face-offs between the two countries and suggests that Washington may have decided to dismount the Pakistani tiger. Tensions peaked with Islamabad closing NATO supply routes to Afghanistan; the arrest of CIA agent Raymond Davis and subsequent expulsion of many CIA agents from Pakistan; the May Day midnight murder of Al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad; and the continuing Drone attacks on the western frontier, which ISI chief Shuja Pasha’s fence-mending visit to Washington could not fix.

New Delhi’s muted reaction is understandable. Fai’s arrest exposes UPA appointees, Justice (retd.) Rajinder Sachar and journalist Dileep Padgaonkar, for hobnobbing with ISI and other anti-India agents abroad and later accepting positions to empower the Muslim minority and Kashmiri separatists respectively, at the cost of the Hindu community and the nation. This raises larger questions regarding the reasons why the Union Government found jobs for persons with anti-India and anti-Hindu proclivities, and why the nation should accept their so-called reports which stand tainted by association.

Going by Washington’s revelations, Islamabad covertly funnelled over $4 million to Fai’s Kashmiri American Council over two decades, to influence American and international opinion against India’s claim to Kashmir. The FBI’s main charge is that Fai and his associate Zaheer Ahmed failed to register with the Justice Department as Pakistan lobbyists. Of course, Washington knew this and was monitoring the duo for many years; it refrained from acting against them while Pakistan was perceived as useful in the war against terrorism. Now, the knives are out; hence the naming of Fai's handlers, viz., Maj. Gen. Mumtaz Ahmad Bajwa; Brig. Javed Aziz Khan, Brig. Sohail Mehmood, Lt. Col. Tauqeer Butt and a man codenamed ‘Abdullah’.

Fai’s job included getting Pakistani and Indian eminences to attend conferences on India’s human rights violations in Kashmir, and escorting men like Mirwaiz to meet White House staff. Recently, Mirwaiz Farooq and Hurriyat leader S.A.S. Geelani met Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar at the embassy in New Delhi, on the eve of talks with her Indian counterpart Mr S.M. Krishna, a move which reduced the official talks to a formality.

Fai’s Indian friend, Justice Rajinder Sachar, was in 2005 appointed by the UPA to head a high powered committee with a mandate to ‘prove’ the backwardness of the Indian Muslim community, and attribute this alleged backwardness to ‘institutional discrimination’ at social, political and economic levels. Though completely lacking empirical data, Mr Sachar strove to entrench a Muslim communal identity in India by pressing for an ‘Equal Opportunity Commission’ and paving the way for unmanageable communal discord.

The Union Ministry of Minority Affairs, egged on by the National Minorities Commission, is working overtime to secure for Muslims an undeclared religion-based reservation in the public and private sectors. Mr Salman Khurshid, as Minority Affairs Minister, strove through 2009 to get reservations for all Muslims under the Backward Communities category, and to persuade the corporate sector to give minorities reservation in lieu of tax rebates. Mr Sachar stressed proportional reservation for Muslims in the police, administrative services, armed forces and public sector. For a nation divided by the impetus created by separate electorates under the British Raj, this is truly macabre.

A discriminated religious community must suffer in terms of parameters like health (IMR, lifespan, growth rate), education (literacy, mean years of schooling, female literacy), general living conditions (absence of overcrowding, access to potable water, toilet facilities) and economic status (participation in work force, per capita income). But most of these human development indicators are favourable for Muslims as compared to Hindus, and in certain instances they are even better than the Hindu General community (e.g., the Infant Mortality Rate for Muslims is 59, as compared to 77 for Hindus). No variation can be attributed to State or institutional discrimination.

Mr Sachar’s most dangerous move, however, was to rectify the low participation of Muslims in politics by proposing de-reservation of Scheduled Caste constituencies where Muslim population is greater through ‘rational delimitation.’ The idea is that Muslim voters will polarize themselves into voting for a Muslim candidate or one compelled to exclusively pander to Muslim interests. This crude cynicism is matched only by his attempt to force the armed forces to submit to a Muslim head count, which was robustly resisted by General J.J. Singh.

Fai’s other friend and Union Home Ministry-appointed chief interlocutor on Jammu & Kashmir is currently under fire from his own colleague Mr M.M. Ansari, as the untimely exposé has blighted their report which was only awaiting the end of the Amarnath Yatra before being submitted to the government, so as not to incite Hindu sentiments. Mr P. Chidambaram fears the Padgaonkar report may now meet the same fate as the Justice Saghir Ahmed working group report, and has tried to minimize Padgaonkar’s enjoying Fai-ISI hospitality and legitimizing the Pakistan-sponsored hate and break-India campaign.

But as Mr Ansari has pointed out, one cannot join a conference without knowing the credibility of the individuals and the institution. Indeed, if the UPA regime wishes to have even an ounce of public credibility, it must crackdown on the Kashmiri separatists who attended the Fai and other seminars and defamed the nation abroad. The Home Minister must explain if he was aware of Mr Padgaonkar’s seminar circuits and biases before appointing him as chief interlocutor on Kashmir. If not, what kind of vetting does the Ministry do before making sensitive appointments?

Mr Chidambaram must urgently bring out a paper listing all Indian nationals who travelled abroad at the invitation of known India-baiters like Fai, Farooq Kathwari and their ilk, with details of the presentations they made there on Kashmir and other alleged human rights violations by Indian security and armed forces. These fifth columnists must be named and shamed, and asked to tender an unconditional apology to the nation for eating its salt, enjoying all the prestige and privileges it bestows upon its unworthy sons, and then playing footsie with its enemies.

Above all, we must be told how Pakistan-ISI, the pro-Pakistan western nations, the ruling UPA, and the anti-national elites, have been found to be on the same page! Shame.

The writer is author, [url="www.vijayvaani.com"]www.vijayvaani.com[/url]

[url="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-squandering-global-role-Ex-NSA-Mishra/articleshow/9509785.cms?prtpage=1"]India squandering global role: Ex-NSA Mishra[/url]

Quote:[url="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toireporter/author-Indrani-Bagchi.cms"]Indrani Bagchi[/url], TNN | Aug 6, 2011, 10.28PM IST NEW DELHI: India has no place in a [url="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/new-world-order"]new world order[/url] because India is failing to break out of South Asia.

[url="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Brajesh-Mishra"]Brajesh Mishra[/url], former national security adviser, said the lack of governance in India was having an adverse effect on India's national security. "We have two enemies on our borders who are keeping us embroiled in South Asia. This reduces our ability to contribute in world affairs." Delivering the first [url="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/K-Subrahmanyam-memorial-lecture"]K Subrahmanyam memorial lecture[/url] in [url="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/New-Delhi"]New Delhi[/url] on Tuesday, Mishra delivered a trenchant criticism of the UPA government's policy paralysis. The lecture, an annual feature, was presided over by Mishra's successor, M K Narayanan, now governor of West Bengal.

"India's role in the world depends on economic and military superiority," he said. But economic reforms have stopped midway. On military modernization, Mishra said, "The government is carrying Bofors on its shoulders. How long should we worry only about personal integrity and not national security?" he asked, a direct hit at defence minister AK Antony, who is accused of going slow on military modernization because of fears of corruption.

He said the US policies in [url="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Pakistan"]Pakistan[/url] puts India in the same predicament as China's policies in Pakistan. "Both are giving arms and material to Pakistan to be used against us. This means we cannot break out." [url="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/China"]China[/url] and Pakistan are military allies, he said. [size="4"]"In four-five years, we might have to defend ourselves on two fronts." [/size]

"Our procedures for acquiring equipment and technology are 19th century. When our 126 MMRCA come they will be obsolete." He derided the government for letting the civilian nuclear initiative run aground.

However, he said, these problems can be fixed if the government put its mind to it. "India is strategically placed in the world. We have security interests from Gulf of Aden to Straits of Malacca."

China, the former NSA said, "Treats us with contempt. Why?" China is trying to be the big player in every multilateral forum, and trying to keep India out. "Overseas, people praise our democracy but go ahead and do business with China." India's efforts should be to reverse this, by making itself more relevant.

India needs to concentrate on building its military power. "There is a place for us in the world. We have to work to get there."
On #126:

Some of what Swamy advocates was already suggested long ago by others and never implemented, other suggestions are no more than grandstanding, some recommendations are downright inane and yet other things are actually ill-advised.

But my next questions have no bearing on that, the following is just to regurgitate the same old Qs already asked by others regarding Swamy:

Wasn't it Swamy whose daughter is married to a muslim (and herself leaning towards anti-Hindu, was it - well, must be anti-Hindu for her to have married a christoislamic). If so, has Swamy successfully reverted his son-in-law to the ancestral religion? And cured his daughter? Else why is he lecturing? And why in the world would Hindus be listening.

Or maybe hypocrisy is all one needs to gain the confidence of the English-educated Hindus - easily impressed as they have long been by unrepresentative people making big plans for their future and making unlikely recommendations.

The only cure for christoislamic terrorism (and all terrorisms of monotheistic tendency) is Reversion to heathenism. There is no other.

But since many Hindus are squeamish about unapologetically aiming to revert those who have been brainwashed out of Hindu religion (and usually into one of the many strains of anti-Hindu-ism), one never hears that objective from them. (Though curiously, many such Hindus never find converting aliens - whose religion this is not and never shall be - repugnant.)

Reversion should be Hindus' goal. Proper reversion - to heathenenism (the native kind).

Hindus should make that their goal, and plan consciously towards it and then work actively towards realising it.

The fact that there's no room for failure (and little enough time for it) ought to be sufficient encouragement to spur Hindus on.
[size="4"][url="http://janamejayan.wordpress.com/2011/08/14/devils-advocate-karan-thapar-interviews-dr-subramanian-swamy/"]‘Devil’s advocate’ Karan Thapar interviews Dr.Subramanian Swamy[/url][/size]
[quote name='Husky' date='13 August 2011 - 08:51 PM' timestamp='1313248434' post='112454']

On #126:

Some of what Swamy advocates was already suggested long ago by others and never implemented, other suggestions are no more than grandstanding, some recommendations are downright inane and yet other things are actually ill-advised.

But my next questions have no bearing on that, the following is just to regurgitate the same old Qs already asked by others regarding Swamy:

Wasn't it Swamy whose daughter is married to a muslim (and herself leaning towards anti-Hindu, was it - well, must be anti-Hindu for her to have married a christoislamic). If so, has Swamy successfully reverted his son-in-law to the ancestral religion? And cured his daughter? Else why is he lecturing? And why in the world would Hindus be listening.

Or maybe hypocrisy is all one needs to gain the confidence of the English-educated Hindus - easily impressed as they have long been by unrepresentative people making big plans for their future and making unlikely recommendations.

The only cure for christoislamic terrorism (and all terrorisms of monotheistic tendency) is Reversion to heathenism. There is no other.

But since many Hindus are squeamish about unapologetically aiming to revert those who have been brainwashed out of Hindu religion (and usually into one of the many strains of anti-Hindu-ism), one never hears that objective from them. (Though curiously, many such Hindus never find converting aliens - whose religion this is not and never shall be - repugnant.)

Reversion should be Hindus' goal. Proper reversion - to heathenenism (the native kind).

Hindus should make that their goal, and plan consciously towards it and then work actively towards realising it.

The fact that there's no room for failure (and little enough time for it) ought to be sufficient encouragement to spur Hindus on.


Pl. don't waste these pages by constantly campaigning for your personal animosity towards Dr.Swamy (which I call it as 'Husky' terrorism!)

And what is 'hethenenism' (your spelling!) thingy? Haven't you heard of 'dharma' and please could you learn to spell that atleast properly?!
[url="http://janamejayan.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/statement-of-dr-subramanian-swamy-of-19th-august-2011/"]Statement of Dr. Subramanian Swamy of 19th August 2011[/url]

1. The National Minority Commission has yet to sent me a Notice despite their announcement in the press two weeks ago of sending it. However, if such a Notice comes I shall first raise the question of corrupt practices of two members Vinod Sharma and Sardar Hanspal Which merit prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act. In case of Mr. Sharma there is also a complaint pending for police prosecution for drunken and disorderly behaviour recently at the India International Centre as well as his physical assalut of a Dalit IAS officer of the of the Steel Ministry.

2. With the the largest number of Himalayan Scams unravelled in modern history during the last two years of the UPA government, and the ridiculous circus witnessed of the authorities in the wholly illegal arrest of Anna Hazare and his colleagues, and the utter incompetence and impotence in dealing with terrorist attacks, I demand the immediate dissolution of the Lok Sabha and holding of a mid-term poll this winter.

3. The Election Commission must hold these polls without using EVMs and instead using the traditional ballot papers, since the EC has not been able to introduce the paper receipts in EVMs as promised by the EC in the Delhi High Court while my Writ Petition on the EVM fraud was being heard

4. I demand the the Jayalalitha State Government immediately withdraw the grossly illegal and anti-religious G.O.s issued by the earlier DMK government to take over the two most sacred temples of Natraja Sri Sabhanayagar and the Tiruchendur Subramania Swamy temples. Even if the matters are now in court, public money should not be wasted on fighting such useless litigation.

5. I warn the Chief Minister that Ms. Sasikala and her Non-resident husband are now auctioning government postings and collecting huge sums. This is the beginning of corruption. If it does not stop I will be forced to go to court to prosecute the CM.
"Husky terrorism"? That inane retort to a legitimate question doesn't even pass for wit.

You must feel persecuted all the time: "Oh my gawd, my shadow keeps *stalking* me every night. It's terrorism, I tell you! Terrorism!" Yeah, *sure* it is...


Mrs Rajan quoted someone she referred to as a PIO (I guess they hold an OCI?):

Quote:I cannot understand how anyone can call Dr. Subramanian Swamy a BIGOT. Dr. Swamy’s brother-in-law is Jewish, his son-in-law Muslim, his sister-in-law Christian and his wife Parsi. One of his two daughters is married to an Indian Muslim with whom he has closest relations, and therefore how can he possibly be a bigot against the Indian Muslims or Christians.
Classic. Swamy's multicultural family's married into not one but all 4 monotheisms at once, of which 2 are aggressively missionising ones. (To be fair, one is not allowed to count his "Parsi wife" as a Parsee: the religion of the Parsees is closed off to any who have married out. Including any offspring thereof, which means none of Swamy's kids can ever be Parsees. I don't make the rules, I'm just repeating them.)

But consider the shock to the PIO person above - busy mounting their watertight defence of Swamy - had Swamy done the Hindu thing and disowned his daughter for marrying a muslim (like the Parsees' religion automatically disowned his wife; one doesn't call Parsees bigots for it). Imagine the "terrorism" of him being called a "BIGOT" then. (Of course, the simple fact of the matter is that Hindus can never be called bigots anyway, because Bigot is literally a synonym for a christian.)

But the question was on what example Dr Subramaniam Swamy has himself set in the very matter he spoke on, in order for Hindus to accept his lectures on what they should do about *christoislamic* terrorism. The question won't go away merely because of irrelevant (and mad) retorts.

- Dr Swamy is free to lecture a Hindu audience about politics etc. That's fine. He can even lecture them on nationalism (since Indian nationalism has come to be equated with unity with christoislamism in India, after all. We're all Indians here. Well, minus the Goan christians, the Kashmiri muslim seccessionists and so too the christian ones in the NE, etc. All of whom insist they are not Indian yet want to take Indian land with them.)

- But Swamy can't lecture Hindus on what they should do about christoislamic terrorism, because 1. islam (like christianism) IS the reason and cause for islamic terrorism, i.e. christianism-islam IS terrorism. And 2. his son-in-law is a muslim = part of the ummah = the hand that implements islam. And 3. Swamy's never turned his daughter out for marrying into islam, but lives with it (apparently "closest of relations" with muslim son-in-law.) Swami's not giving Hindus any reason to trust him - though some clearly trust him implicitly.

But since he's done nothing about islam at home, why would Hindus listen to him telling them what to do about (christo)islam in the homeland? It sounds like so much inconsistency: sounds like asking people to do what you can't/won't do yourself.

And on the other matter. That several of Dr Swamy's suggestions above are downright silly and meaningless are surely obvious to anyone. (It wouldn't have mattered if he said this in private, but he should make what he said in public count.)

E.g. it does not suffice that anti-Hindu Indians of the terrorist ideologies should merely "acknowledge that their ancestors were Hindus": many (Goan christians and Indian islamics) already do that. But they still work at full throttle to exterminate Hindu religion from the country. It's because they believe that whatever Gods their ancestors may have adhered to in the past, these were "false gods" and that all Hindus should be made to accept the "one true gawd". <- That's commandment #1 of christoislamism. Quite easy to understand.

Another example. Suggesting that the singing of the Vande Mataram be made compulsory is of no avail either. Obviously Swamy has failed to understand christoislamism, else he wouldn't have suggested it.

Pasting a relevant excerpt again:

Quote:But Muslim League continued its campaign to dethrone even the first two stanzas of the VM . In the lagislative assemblies they would boycott the singing of the song or raise point of orders or bring adjournment motions etc . and would make a plea that `singing of VM is a declaration of war on Islam.' To appease them in Madras assembly from January 28, 1938, the practice of reciting from the Qiran and a prayer in English was also introduced . But ML was not satisfied, it continued to demand the deletion of VM from national movement, and to this effect it passed a resolution (Pirpur Report, Nov.15, 1938) which listed numerous grievences of the Muslims, VM song had topped the list.

And it's not only muslims, but christians also, who think that mandating even just the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram is essentially a "declaration of war on their religion". That's because it goes against commandment #1. They are not allowed to bow down to any other than the christoislamic gawd entity and may not do idolatry either. And the very words "Vande Mataram", which is a namaskaram to the mother-land (even if you were to see the reference as being to no more than mere land) IS *idolatry* in words and thought, and moreover counts as worship of a false God (because it is worship directed at something other than the invisible=non-existent christoislamic gawd, which is disallowed by christoislamism). And I'm here not even referring to some other lines from the Vande Mataram, which are actually downright "polytheistic idolatry" as jeebusjehovallah's Word would describe it. Indians - nationalists especially - do not understand christoislamism. Singing the Vande Mataram is absolutely the antithesis of what the sheepish ummah are allowed to do. So making such silly suggestions is just that: Silly. And just because Dr Swamy made it (as other nationalists did before), doesn't make it any more intelligent or likely to get any better response from christoislamism.

If Swamy's going to ask for christians and muslims to break commandment #1 ("sing Vande Mataram!"), surely may as well ask them to revert altogether?

As just said, it's ultimately a useless statement that India be declared "a Hindu Rashtra in which non-Hindus can vote only if they proudly acknowledge that their ancestors were Hindus. Rename India Hindustan as a nation of Hindus and those whose ancestors were Hindus". What's there in the statement that christoislamiterrorism could object to? They can always turn India into a "darul-islam/India-for-christ" being "a nation of those whose ancestors *were* Hindus (but whose descendants are so no longer, and proud)". I.e. Hindustan-for-Jeebusjehovallah, the land of ex-Hindus. <- That still entirely satisfies the parameters of Swamy's request.

If people are going to make (well-nigh) unrealistic demands, make the right ones to plan towards. (If you're going to plant seeds of ideas/objectives into people's minds from your influential position, it should be meaningful objectives. Them being unrealistic is not a problem in itself, but them being worthwhile *is* essential.) So make the right demands, especially when the christowest is going to silence you either way shortly after: apparently they boo-ed at Swamy and implied he - and by extension Hindus, whom he is seen to represent - was a bigot. He may as well have said something to deserve it: reverted his family and then declared that Hindus' intent should be to revert the nation. And mean it when he says it.

I'm not "against Swamy" - I don't know him (though his acquisition of relations does nothing to win trust.)

But he aims to speak for and guide Hindus. And he seems to do some other things right.

But he better MEAN it. Because this is not a joke to Hindus, not a job, not a mantle they wear during the day or during a period in their life. At the end of the day, they don't go back to multicultural families and do not live with (nor would they survive with) mutually-exclusive religions. This is not politics for them. This is their future. He better be worthy of those whose trust he wishes to gain. Yet how can he be, when he is so unrepresentative on such an important point...
Husky, pl. hold your breath! Yes I said "'Husky' terrorism!" Didn't you see the exclamation mark at the end? It was written in jest, surely. Your shadow isn't long enough to get past four feet!

What a waste of time and energy that you write so much against one person, it's so ridiculous! What do you gain? Who in the world is gaining when you talk ill of Dr.Swamy? Think! You even picked on Smt. Radha Rajan the modern day Lakshmi Bai. (By the way Jansi Raani Laksmi Bai was a Brahmin.) You should listen to this heroine and there is one I post here for example:

[url="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6864335520571762844/videoplay?docid=-6864335520571762844"]Intellectual Terrorism[/url]

Incidentally there are so many definitions for 'Hindu' and yours is a queer one! Of course you have a right to hold on to it and I respect it.
[color="#FF0000"][size="4"]Dr.Subramanian Swamy on Hindu Unity[/size][/color]

You will surely be doing yourself a great favour by listening to Dr. Swamy's lecture at Dallas, TX. Pl. judge him by your first hand opinion and not by hearsay to which we are unfortunately prone to.

Part 1 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZGDFTk7m...r_embedded#!

Part 2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=750ZzfsMWrw&NR=1

Part 3 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRBgr1Up0qQ&NR=1

Part 4 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHaj_DCH3IU&NR=1

Part 5 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHOeMVKBUy4&NR=1

Part 6 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkdqtjHXp5w&NR=1

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)