<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>RSS backs Rajnath</b>
Pioneer News Service | New Delhi
The RSS has joined former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee in endorsing BJP chief Rajnath Singh's selection of the national executive and office-bearers.

The RSS' support to Singh will help him silence critics in the party for dropping Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi from the Parliamentary Board and reducing the stature of some other leaders.

"The new team is a carefully crafted exercise in political manoeuvre and accommodation," the RSS said in an editorial in the Sangh mouthpiece Organiser.

The flattering editorial added: "He (Singh) has cobbled together a young team of office-bearers, sticking to the principle of continuity with change.

"Since the BJP is fortunate to have a large array of talented and experienced leadership reserve, it is not an easy task for any leader to present a perfectly inclusive team in an organisationally exclusive structure. The beauty is that he has not disturbed the rhythm of the onward march."
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Did anyone catch this news?

Rahul Gandhi has sent notices to Hinduunity.org website - to a person named Rohit Viasman and Ezboard website - for spreading "obscenene and indecent" information about him.

Abhishek Singhvi, his lawyer (and Congress spokesman) said it was very hard to find out the names and addresses of people sending information on Internet, but somehow he managed to find out the identity of these people, who are living in the USA. He also said this information was spread from the Hinduunity website and the person claims to be a Bajrang Dal activist. He said these people are bringing a badname to Hinduism.

http://www.jagran.com/news/national.aspx?id=3080998
and
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Rahul_G...how/1556410.cms

A little bit of google gave this document : http://melbourne.indymedia.org/uploads/rahul.pdf

1. Above document clearly has the postal address and email address of the writer. So why did Mr. Abhishek Singhvi have any difficulty identifying or reaching the owners of the document?

2. Isn't HinduUnity website banned in India anyways?

Here is the blogspot blog about the case : http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2007/01/...-gang-rape.html

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->It's a pity that Pat Robertson never studied European history, or the history of his own ancestors who all came running to the New World ( America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, S. Africa, etc) from the christianized Old World (Europe), to escape the gruelling poverty of the Old World. Anyone who has read European history, or studied historical demography of Europe, or even the classic literature from 18th-19th century Europe, will understand the extent to which European society was plagued by extreme rampant poverty, terrible living conditions, and social divisions, which prompted the migration of millions of Europeans to the New Worlds in serch of better life. Yet, Europe was very much christian when poverty of an excruciating nature prevailed in Europe.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Very true. One can even get a glimpse of the grinding poverty from Charles Dickens' writings, or see it in the dramatised versions made by English channels: David Copperfield, Our Mutual Friend, Oliver Twist, Nicholas Nickleby. Also such programmes as the more recent North and South - which is significantly about the cotton industry in Manchester (their cotton industry could only survive because Britain systematically destroyed India's). In this last film, there's even a scene set at a London exhibition displaying items from 'all over the British Empire'. In one part of this scene you can see the characters standing in front of a Hindu statue.

The making-of of 'Our Mutual Friend' also has one of the actors saying something quite insightful: how the drama's setting of the Britain of that time was depicted rather accurately, and how the lower classes (who made up the poor) lived like they were in the slums of today's "Karachi" (actor's words). They literally lived in grime and dirt and had to scrape their living out of the roadside. By accident, the actor interviewed made some very good choice of words, even if Karachi does not come out favourably because of the comparison.
They play this stuff on TV here, and if they do so where you all are living, watch it. These are good to get some view of their history, as well as to see the sympathetic characters created by Dickens and the other English authors. (The regular people who stayed put in Britain appear to have been far better people than the christoterrorist colonials who terrorised India; at least when going by these dramas).

Britain's increase in wealth is directly proportional to India's increase in poverty.
Same correlation applies to all of colonial west and formerly-colonised countries.
The west really has to learn this which is the only thing that will teach it to stop slighting its former victims by its ignorance, an ignorance that still continues the colonial attitude of how 'they don't care'. The formerly-colonised countries also need to learn and remember this so that they know their poverty has nothing to do with their Old religions.

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Gorakhpur (Uttar Pradesh), Jan 27 (ANI): Violence erupted in Gorakhpur on Saturday, after a young man was stabbed to death during a minor scuffle between Hindus and Muslims.

Police said Hindus and Muslims clashed after 24-year-old Rajkumar Agrahari was killed when he had an argument with men taking out Moharram procession on Friday night.

The mob later damaged cars, attacked various shops and burnt them.

Eyewitnesses said that the police had to resort to a baton-charge to disperse the crowd.

"There were some anti-nationals in the mob. When everyone started walking, they attacked the Hindus. Their houses have been vandalised and their cars have been attacked. A car has been burnt. The situation is worsening here," said an eyewitness.
At least a dozen people were injured in the scuffle. (ANI)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Probably too late for a new thread on this but still.. Here's to a leader who turned his country around.

http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/jan/25guest1.htm

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Russian President Vladimir Putin's visit to India on Thursday will be a landmark event. This could be, in all probability, Putin's last State visit to India before laying down office following a momentous eight-year period in power in the Kremlin.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

<b>This year, Putin means business</b>

This thread is the discussing the swastika and all the news about
Swastika

Hi everybody!!
I've read about an Hindu ISKON community in Kazakistan victim of persecutions, their houses have been destroyed and they have been left without a place even if the weather is bad, cold and sonwing.
There is a petition to defend rights of this Hindu and even of every non-muslim religious community in Kazakistan (where the main of the population is muslim)...
The link is:

www.petitiononline.com/Krsna108/petition/html

Save Hindus!!!!
Thankyou all!!

This thread is to discuss the role of Xtianity and Islam in slavery. Does the Bible condone slavery? Does the Koran? Are today's black people -Xtian and Muslim- worshipping their tormentors?

Black people comprise a sizeable chunk of the US, and Baptists etc have cleverly deceived poor black people into singing praises of Jesus. The black "Nation of Islam", has chosen Islam as the "religion" through which it will express its anti-white feelings, which is misplaced, to say the least.

The Baptists etc. are able to make plans to harvest souls so freely in Asia partly because their own homes are safe in America. A black "insurgency" will put a spanner in the missionary works.

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->can u imagine an India with both pakistan and bangladesh? Would india have seen even this relative "peace" of the last 50 years? We only fought 4 big wars and about 20 years of militancy in about quarter of india's territories.

If gandhi was father of india's independence from the british, jinnah is father of india's prosperity. had it not been for jinnah's long term thinking, we would still be pulled down by larger population of muslims (although gandhi offered Prime minister post to jinnah, jinnah wondered what would happen after he and gandhi died. he knew he was dying soon of cancer anyway) <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Wouldn't it be preferable to have had an full scale civil war and winner takes all instead of the slow secular death we are dying today, in my study of history I have not seen another nation which acted as dumb as we did, why did we have partition in the first place if the population exchange was only going to be a one way street?

Today we are told that we don't accept the 2 nation theory then why did we concede partition (built on this premise) in the first place, if we were really serious about not accepting it then we would have fought to keep India united, but we agreed to partition but still make absurd claims of brotherhood.

Tomorrow we will have another partition and then these secularists will come settle down in the remaining chunk we have left and begin fighting against the dreaded Hindu communalists all over again.

All Communists should have been deported to Pakistan since they supported partition but now claim that they didn't.